scholarly journals Mate discrimination among subspecies through a conserved olfactory pathway

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (25) ◽  
pp. eaba5279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Khallaf ◽  
Thomas O. Auer ◽  
Veit Grabe ◽  
Ana Depetris-Chauvin ◽  
Byrappa Ammagarahalli ◽  
...  

Communication mechanisms underlying the sexual isolation of species are poorly understood. Using four subspecies of Drosophila mojavensis as a model, we identify two behaviorally active, male-specific pheromones. One functions as a conserved male antiaphrodisiac in all subspecies and acts via gustation. The second induces female receptivity via olfaction exclusively in the two subspecies that produce it. Genetic analysis of the cognate receptor for the olfactory pheromone indicates an important role for this sensory pathway in promoting sexual isolation of subspecies, in combination with auditory signals. Unexpectedly, the peripheral sensory pathway detecting this pheromone is conserved molecularly, physiologically, and anatomically across subspecies. These observations imply that subspecies-specific behaviors arise from differential interpretation of the same peripheral cue, reminiscent of sexually conserved detection but dimorphic interpretation of male pheromones in Drosophila melanogaster. Our results reveal that, during incipient speciation, pheromone production, detection, and interpretation do not necessarily evolve in a coordinated manner.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Khallaf ◽  
Thomas O. Auer ◽  
Veit Grabe ◽  
Ana Depetris-Chauvin ◽  
Byrappa Ammagarahalli ◽  
...  

SummarySignaling mechanisms underlying the sexual isolation of species are poorly understood. Using four subspecies of Drosophila mojavensis as a model, we identify two behaviorally active male-specific pheromones. One functions as a conserved male anti-aphrodisiac in all subspecies and acts via gustation. The second induces female receptivity via olfaction exclusively in the two subspecies that produce it. Genetic analysis of the cognate receptor for the olfactory pheromone indicates an important role for this sensory pathway in promoting sexual isolation of subspecies, in collaboration with auditory signals. Surprisingly, the peripheral sensory pathway detecting this pheromone is conserved molecularly, physiologically and anatomically across subspecies. These observations imply that subspecies-specific behaviors arise from differential interpretation of the same peripheral cue, reminiscent of sexually conserved detection but dimorphic interpretation of male pheromones in D. melanogaster. Our results reveal that, during incipient speciation, pheromone production, detection and interpretation do not necessarily evolve in a coordinate manner.


Evolution ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope Hollocher ◽  
Chau-Ti Ting ◽  
Francine Pollack ◽  
Chung-I. Wu

1995 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 2519-2523 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. I. Wu ◽  
H. Hollocher ◽  
D. J. Begun ◽  
C. F. Aquadro ◽  
Y. Xu ◽  
...  

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 147 (3) ◽  
pp. 1191-1201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope Hollocher ◽  
Chau-Ti Ting ◽  
Mao-Lien Wu ◽  
Chug-I Wu

The collection of Drosophila melanogaster from Zimbabwe and nearby regions (the Z-type) yield females who would not mate with the cosmopolitan D. melanogaster males (the M-type). To dissect the genetic basis of this sexual isolation, we constructed 16 whole-chromosome substitution lines between two standard Z- and M-lines. The results were as follows: (1) All substitution lines appear normal in viability and fertility in both sexes, indicating no strong postmating isolation. (2) The genes for the behaviors are mapped to all three major chromosomes with the same ranking and comparable magnitude of effects for both sexes: III > II ⪢ X ≥ 0 (III, II and X designate the effects of the three chromosomes). The results suggest less evolution on the X than on autosomes at loci of sexual behavior. (3) The genes for “Z-maleness” are many and somewhat redundant. Whole-chromosome effects for Z-maleness appear nearly additive and show little dominance. (4) In contrast, “Z-femaleness” has less redundancy as partial genotypes never exhibit full phenotypic effects. Epistatic interactions and incomplete dominance can sometimes be detected. (5) The extensive genetic divergence underlying sexual isolation has evolved in the absence of detectable reduction in hybrid fitnesses. Sexual selection has apparently been a driving force of multiple facets of speciation at the nascent stage without reinforcement.


Genetics ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-358
Author(s):  
Eliezer Lifschytz ◽  
Raphael Falk

1996 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerry A. Coyne

SummarySexual isolation between the sibling species D. simulans and D. mauritiana is due largely to the rejection of D. simulans males by D. mauritiana females. Genetic analysis shows that genes on the X and third chromosomes contribute to the differences between males causing sexual isolation, while the Y chromosome, second chromosome and cytoplasm have no effect. These chromosome effects differ from those observed in a previous analysis of sexual isolation in hybrid females, implying that different genes cause sexual isolation in the two sexes.


Science ◽  
1957 ◽  
Vol 126 (3267) ◽  
pp. 256-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. LIBET

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document