drosophila simulans
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

521
(FIVE YEARS 34)

H-INDEX

49
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 102 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayda Susana Ortiz-Baez ◽  
Mang Shi ◽  
Ary A. Hoffmann ◽  
Edward C. Holmes

The endosymbiont bacteria of the genus Wolbachia are associated with multiple mutualistic effects on insect biology, including nutritional and antiviral properties. Members of the genus Wolbachia naturally occur in fly species of the genus Drosophila, providing an operational model host for studying how virome composition may be affected by its presence. Drosophila simulans populations can carry a variety of strains of members of the genus Wolbachia , with the wAu strain associated with strong antiviral protection under experimental conditions. We used D. simulans sampled from the Perth Hills, Western Australia, to investigate the potential virus protective effect of the wAu strain of Wolbachia on individual wild-caught flies. Our data revealed no appreciable variation in virus composition and abundance between individuals infected or uninfected with Wolbachia associated with the presence or absence of wAu. However, it remains unclear whether wAu might affect viral infection and host survival by increasing tolerance rather than inducing complete resistance. These data also provide new insights into the natural virome diversity of D. simulans. Despite the small number of individuals sampled, we identified a repertoire of RNA viruses, including nora virus, galbut virus, thika virus and La Jolla virus, that have been identified in other species of the genus Drosophila. Chaq virus-like sequences associated with galbut virus were also detected. In addition, we identified five novel viruses from the families Reoviridae, Tombusviridae, Mitoviridae and Bunyaviridae. Overall, this study highlights the complex interaction between Wolbachia and RNA virus infections and provides a baseline description of the natural virome of D. simulans.


Evolution ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Serrato‐Capuchina ◽  
Emmanuel R. R. D'Agostino ◽  
David Peede ◽  
Baylee Roy ◽  
Kristin Isbell ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daven C. Presgraves ◽  
Colin D. Meiklejohn

The three fruitfly species of the Drosophila simulans clade— D. simulans, D. mauritiana, and D. sechellia— have served as important models in speciation genetics for over 40 years. These species are reproductively isolated by geography, ecology, sexual signals, postmating-prezygotic interactions, and postzygotic genetic incompatibilities. All pairwise crosses between these species conform to Haldane’s rule, producing fertile F1 hybrid females and sterile F1 hybrid males. The close phylogenetic proximity of the D. simulans clade species to the model organism, D. melanogaster, has empowered genetic analyses of their species differences, including reproductive incompatibilities. But perhaps no phenotype has been subject to more continuous and intensive genetic scrutiny than hybrid male sterility. Here we review the history, progress, and current state of our understanding of hybrid male sterility among the D. simulans clade species. Our aim is to integrate the available information from experimental and population genetics analyses bearing on the causes and consequences of hybrid male sterility. We highlight numerous conclusions that have emerged as well as issues that remain unresolved. We focus on the special role of sex chromosomes, the fine-scale genetic architecture of hybrid male sterility, and the history of gene flow between species. The biggest surprises to emerge from this work are that (i) genetic conflicts may be an important general force in the evolution of hybrid incompatibility, (ii) hybrid male sterility is polygenic with contributions of complex epistasis, and (iii) speciation, even among these geographically allopatric taxa, has involved the interplay of gene flow, negative selection, and positive selection. These three conclusions are marked departures from the classical views of speciation that emerged from the modern evolutionary synthesis.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayda Susana Ortiz-Baez ◽  
Mang Shi ◽  
Ary A. Hoffmann ◽  
Edward C Holmes

The endosymbiont bacterium Wolbachia is associated with multiple mutualistic effects on insect biology, including nutritional and antiviral properties. Wolbachia naturally occurs in Drosophila fly species, providing an operational model host to study how virome composition may be impacted by its presence. Drosophila simulans populations can carry a variety of Wolbachia strains. In particular, the wAu strain of Wolbachia has been associated with strong antiviral protection under experimental conditions. We used D. simulans sampled from the Perth Hills, Western Australia, to investigate the potential virus protective effect of the wAu strain on individual wild-caught flies. Our data revealed no appreciable variation in virus composition and abundance between Wolbachia infected/uninfected individuals associated with the presence/absence of wAu. However, it remains unclear whether wAu might impact viral infection and host survival by increasing tolerance rather than inducing complete resistance. These data also provide new insights into the natural virome diversity of D. simulans. Despite the small number of individuals sampled, we identified a repertoire of RNA viruses, including Nora virus, Galbut virus, Chaq virus, Thika virus and La Jolla virus, that have been identified in other Drosophila species. In addition, we identified five novel viruses from the families Reoviridae, Tombusviridae, Mitoviridae and Bunyaviridae. Overall, this study highlights the complex interaction between Wolbachia and RNA virus infections and provides a baseline description of the natural virome of D. simulans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahul Chakraborty ◽  
Ching-Ho Chang ◽  
Danielle E. Khost ◽  
Jeffrey Vedanayagam ◽  
Jeffrey R. Adrion ◽  
...  

Evolution ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarissa House ◽  
Zenobia Lewis ◽  
MD Sharma ◽  
David J. Hodgson ◽  
John Hunt ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. Murashov ◽  
Elena S. Pak ◽  
Chien‐Te Lin ◽  
Ilya N. Boykov ◽  
Katherine A. Buddo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper G. Sørensen ◽  
Tommaso Manenti ◽  
Jesper S. Bechsgaard ◽  
Mads F. Schou ◽  
Torsten N. Kristensen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1606-1613
Author(s):  
C. Ruth Archer ◽  
Matthew Robert Carey ◽  
Tomohito Noda ◽  
Stefan J. Store ◽  
David J. Hosken

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document