Medical litigation: who benefits?

BMJ ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 322 (7295) ◽  
pp. 1189-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Barton
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 109-133
Author(s):  
Bing-Feng Bao ◽  
◽  
Ya-Qi Yang ◽  
Keyword(s):  

The Lancet ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 347 (9001) ◽  
pp. 620
Author(s):  
Anthony Barton
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Yup Lee ◽  
Jung Hee Byun ◽  
Kook In Park ◽  
So Yoon Kim ◽  
Mi Jin Lee
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold Tan

The traditional tort system in medical malpractice is increasingly perceived as being incapable of addressing the mismatch between claims and negligent injuries. Tort reforms have been introduced in various developed countries in an attempt to bring about greater fairness and economic sustainability in the compensation of medical injuries and to reduce the overall rate of medical litigation. This paper reviews the key tort reforms that have been used in various countries, notably the US and the UK, and discusses the arguments that had been put forth by advocates and opponents of such reforms. The impact of these tort reforms, where studied and available, is also reviewed and discussed in the paper.


Author(s):  
Hiralal Konar ◽  
Mausumi Banerjee ◽  
Sajal Datta
Keyword(s):  

1996 ◽  
Vol 164 (11) ◽  
pp. 701-703
Author(s):  
Paul A Komesaroff
Keyword(s):  

Clinical Risk ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
David Body
Keyword(s):  

SLEEP ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Plazzi ◽  
David Rye ◽  
Luca Vignatelli ◽  
Roberto Riva ◽  
Elio Lugaresi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document