PWE-111 A pilot of the malnutrition universal screening tool (‘must’) in a general outpatient department

Author(s):  
Rebecca Ford ◽  
Lauren O’Flynn ◽  
Teri Kilbane ◽  
Nicola Wyer ◽  
Nicola Burch
2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (OCE3) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Merriman ◽  
H. F. Scott ◽  
K. E. Paterson ◽  
R. Lee ◽  
E. A. Wainwright

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Julia Walsh ◽  
Nariman D. Karanjia ◽  
Andrew Taylor ◽  
Callum Livingstone

Background. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and correlates of Se deficiency in patients referred for parenteral nutrition (PN) and to assess the response to a standard supplementation regimen. Methods. Adult patients (53) were recruited prior to commencing a PN regimen delivering 32 µg (0.4 µmol) Se per 24–36 h. Serum Se concentrations were measured before and daily during PN. Results. At baseline 49 (92%) patients had serum Se concentrations below the reference range (0.9–1.65 μmol/L). Se concentrations climbed during PN from 0.49±0.23 (mean ± SD) to 0.57±0.22 μmol/L (P<0.05), but in 48 (91%) patients the concentrations remained low at post-PN. Taking a Se concentration below 0.6 μmol/L as indicative of depletion in the presence of an acute phase response (APR), 37 (70%) patients had Se depletion at baseline and in 27 (51%), levels remained low at post-PN. Baseline serum Se predicted the length of hospital stay (r=-0.36, P<0.05). Increased “malnutrition universal screening tool” score predicted low Se (r=-0.93, P<0.05). Conclusions. Patients referred for PN have a high prevalence of Se deficiency, even when the APR is taken into account. Se supplementation of 32 µg Se per 24–36 h is insufficient for most patients. Baseline serum Se may have prognostic value.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Milito ◽  
Krizia Aquilino ◽  
Veronica Lazzari ◽  
Sara Boveri ◽  
Nadia Munizio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document