Emergence of complex receptive field properties of ganglion cells in the developing turtle retina

1. Receptive field properties of adult retinal ganglion cells are well documented, but little is known about their development. We made extracellular recordings of activity from turtle retinal ganglion cells during embryogenesis (stages 22-26), during the first 40 days posthatching, and in adults. 2. From stage 22 the cells fired in spontaneous recurring bursts, and from stage 23 they responded to light. Polar plots of the responses to motion were highly anisotropic in early embryonic cells. More than 40% of embryonic cells exhibited multiaxis anisotropy, and only 6% were statistically isotropic. The incidence of anisotropic cells gradually decreased throughout development. The incidence of isotropic cells and the excitatory receptive field diameters of all ganglion cells gradually increased during development and their maturation coincided with the disappearance of the spontaneous bursts (2-4 wk posthatching). 3. Both sensitivities to stimulus orientation and direction of motion were observed at the earliest stages of development. However, orientation selectivity reached a peak incidence at hatching, whereas directional selectivity completely disappeared, only to reappear in adults. 4. These results show that mature spatiotemporal receptive field properties of retinal ganglion cells emerge from initially highly anisotropic properties, which may reflect an immature, polarized dendritic layout. Their maturation might be mediated by dendritic outgrowth and strengthening of excitatory synaptic connections, which could be induced by spontaneous activity and driven to maturation by exposure to light at birth. Mature directional selectivity seems to require visual experience or the late establishment of a specialized inhibitory synaptic drive.

Download Full-text

Computation of motion direction by quail retinal ganglion cells that have a nonconcentric receptive field

Visual Neuroscience ◽

10.1017/s0952523800172086 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 263-271 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

HIROYUKI UCHIYAMA ◽

TAKAHIDE KANAYA ◽

SHOICHI SONOHATA

Keyword(s):

Receptive Field ◽

Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽

Japanese Quail ◽

Ganglion Cells ◽

Receptive Fields ◽

Object Motion ◽

Directional Selectivity ◽

Retinal Ganglion ◽

Motion Direction ◽

Neuronal Mechanisms

One type of retinal ganglion cells prefers object motion in a particular direction. Neuronal mechanisms for the computation of motion direction are still unknown. We quantitatively mapped excitatory and inhibitory regions of receptive fields for directionally selective retinal ganglion cells in the Japanese quail, and found that the inhibitory regions are displaced about 1–3 deg toward the side where the null sweep starts, relative to the excitatory regions. Directional selectivity thus results from delayed transient suppression exerted by the nonconcentrically arranged inhibitory regions, and not by local directional inhibition as hypothesized by Barlow and Levick (1965).

Download Full-text

Compensation for population size mismatches in the hamster retinotectal system: Alterations in the organization of retinal projections

Visual Neuroscience ◽

10.1017/s0952523800006271 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 6 (3) ◽

pp. 271-281 ◽

Cited By ~ 17

Author(s):

S.L. Pallas ◽

B.L. Finlay

Keyword(s):

Receptive Field ◽

Injection Site ◽

Ganglion Cell ◽

Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽

Ganglion Cells ◽

Fragment Size ◽

Field Size ◽

Retinal Ganglion ◽

Receptive Field Size ◽

Receptive Field Properties

AbstractUnilateral partial ablation of the superior colliculus in the hamster results in a compression of the retinotopic map onto the remaining tectal fragment. In a previous electrophysiological study (Pallas & Finlay, 1989a), we demonstrated that receptive-field properties of single tectal units (including receptive-field size) remain unchanged, despite the increased afferent/target convergence ratios in the compressed tecta. The present study was done to investigate the mechanism that produces increased convergence from retina to tectum at the population level while maintaining apparent stability of convergence at the single neuron level. We injected comparable quantities of horseradish peroxidase into the tecta of normal adult hamsters and adult hamsters that had received neonatal partial tectal ablations of varying magnitude. We then compared the area of retina backfilled from the injection and the number and density of labeled retinal ganglion cells within it to the size of the remaining tectal fragment.As expected from earlier anatomical (Jhaveri & Schneider, 1974) and physiological (Finlay et al., 1979a; Pallas & Finlay, 1989a) studies demonstrating compression of the retinotectal projection, we found that the area of retina labeled from a single tectal injection site increases linearly with decreasing tectal fragment size. However, for fragment sizes down to 30% of normal, total number of retinal ganglion cells projecting to the injection site remains in or above the normal range. For large lesions (less than 30% of tectum remaining), total number of labeled retinal ganglion cells declines from normal, despite the fact that a larger absolute area of retina is represented on each unit of tectum under these conditions. Comparison of retinal ganglion cell density with tectal fragment size shows an initial decline with decreasing fragment size, which becomes sharper with very large lesions (small tectal fragments).The maintenance of the normal number of retinal ganglion cells innervating each patch of tectum could be accomplished by an elimination of the tectal collaterals of some retinal ganglion cells. Our results suggest that, in addition to collateral elimination, reduction in the size of ganglion cell arbors is occurring, since the peak density of backfilled ganglion cells declines less rapidly than backfilled retinal area increases, especially for small lesions. However, arbor reduction and collateral elimination must occur in such a way that individual tectal cells represent the same amount of visual space as normal.Thus, collateral elimination and arbor reduction are two mechanisms that operate to maintain afferent/target convergence ratios (and thus receptive-field properties) over large variations in afferent availability. This compensation may occur through an activity-dependent stabilization mechanism that does not change its selectivity even when excess afferents are available. For very large lesion sizes, receptive-field size and innervating ganglion cell number and density are not preserved, thus demonstrating a limit to the afferent/target matching mechanism. The same ontogenetic mechanisms might provide a buffer for normal variations in afferent populations, and could help to align topographic maps with differing numbers of afferents.

Download Full-text