scholarly journals Strategy for Safe Performance of Extrathoracic Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla in the Presence of Cardiac Pacemakers in Non–Pacemaker-Dependent Patients

Circulation ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 114 (12) ◽  
pp. 1285-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Sommer ◽  
Claas P. Naehle ◽  
Alexander Yang ◽  
Volkert Zeijlemaker ◽  
Matthias Hackenbroch ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
B. Diem ◽  
S. Achenbach ◽  
T. Bieberle ◽  
V. Schibgilla ◽  
K. Bachmann ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN WOLLMANN ◽  
MATTHIAS GRUDE ◽  
BERND TOMBACH ◽  
HARALD KUGEL ◽  
WALTER HEINDEL ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRISTIAN VAHLHAUS ◽  
TORSTEN SOMMER ◽  
THORSTEN LEWALTER ◽  
RAINER SCHIMPF ◽  
BURGHARD SCHUMACHER ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth F. Mattucci ◽  
Michael Setzen ◽  
Roger Hyman ◽  
Govind Chaturvedi

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, a relatively new diagnostic instrument, is a noninvasive imaging method which, among its many advantages, uses no ionizing radiation. There are a few limitations and contraindications to its use. There may be displacement of intracerebral aneurysm clips and metallic implants, and cardiac pacemakers can be disabled because of the high magnetic field created by this device. We studied the effects of a magnetic field on metallic middle ear prosthetics and concluded that nuclear magnetic resonance imaging should offer no risks to hearing or otologic function in patients with nonferromagnetic metallic middle ear prosthetics. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging is contraindicated in patients with cochlear implants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document