Abstract 2721: Probabilistic Matching of Computerized Emergency Medical Services (EMS) records and Emergency Department and Patient Discharge Data: a Novel Approach to Evaluation of Prehospital Stroke Care

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanthi Govindarajan ◽  
Larry Cook ◽  
David Ghilarducci ◽  
S C Johnston

Background and Purpose: Emergency Medical Services is an important element of acute stroke care. However, evaluation of prehospital stroke care is limited by lack of exchange of patient outcome data between hospitals and emergency medical services (EMS) agencies. In this study, we describe and demonstrate the feasibility of linking county wide patient level ambulance data with emergency department (EDD) and patient discharge data (PDD) using a probabilistic matching algorithm. Methods: Probabilistic linkage was used to match county-wide ambulance data from 2005-2007 to hospital (EDD and PDD) records with a final ICD -9 diagnosis of stroke (430-436). The linkage model was based on the patient’s transport/admission date, date of birth, race, sex, county of residence, and destination hospital. Probabilistic linkage was performed using LinkSolv version 8.29746 which calculates the probability that a pair of records is a true match based on agreement/disagreement patterns of the linkage variables. Pairs of records with a match probability of 0.8 or higher were considered true matches. All other pairs were false matches and rejected. Results: During 2005 - 2007 there were 310,731 patients transported to a facility in county and 34,785 hospital records with a diagnosis of stroke. Using the linkage algorithm we identified 11,473 (33%) matches with EMS records. Linkage rates increased each year with 30%, 34%, and 36% of hospital patients matching EMS record for 2005, 2006, and 2007 respectively. The median match probability was 0.993 and the IQR was 0.974 to 0.9996. By taking the compliment of the match probability we estimate our linked sample to include 255 (2%) false matches. Date of treatment/admission and the patient’s sex were observed to be the most reliable, disagreeing on less than one percent (1%) of all matched pairs. Patient’s zip code was the least reliable, disagreeing on one third of matched pairs. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that probabilistic matching can be used to create a comprehensive patient care record which in turn can provide opportunities for researchers to study different phases of stroke care.

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth F. Mock ◽  
Keith D. Wrenn ◽  
Seth W. Wright ◽  
T. Chadwick Eustis ◽  
Corey M. Slovis

AbstractHypothesis:To determine the type and frequency of immediate unsolicited feedback received by emergency medical service (EMS) providers from patients or their family members and emergency department (ED) personnel.Methods:Prospective, observational study of 69 emergency medical services providers in an urban emergency medical service system and 12 metropolitan emergency departments. Feedback was rated by two medical student observers using a prospectively devised original scale.Results:In 295 encounters with patients or family, feedback was rated as follows: 1) none in 224 (76%); 2) positive in 51 (17%); 3) negative in 19 (6%); and 4) mixed in one (<1%). Feedback from 254 encounters with emergency department personnel was rated as: 1) none in 185 (73%); 2) positive in 46 (18%); 3) negative in 21 (8%); and 4) mixed in 2 (1%). Patients who had consumed alcohol were more likely to give negative feedback than were patients who had not consumed alcohol. Feedback from emergency department personnel occurred more often when the emergency medical service provider considered the patient to be critically ill.Conclusion:The two groups provided feedback to emergency medical service providers in approximately one quarter of the calls. When feedback was provided, it was positive more than twice as often as it was negative. Emergency physicians should give regular and constructive feedback to emergency medical services providers more often than currently is the case.


2021 ◽  
Vol 136 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 54S-61S
Author(s):  
Jonathan Fix ◽  
Amy I. Ising ◽  
Scott K. Proescholdbell ◽  
Dennis M. Falls ◽  
Catherine S. Wolff ◽  
...  

Introduction Linking emergency medical services (EMS) data to emergency department (ED) data enables assessing the continuum of care and evaluating patient outcomes. We developed novel methods to enhance linkage performance and analysis of EMS and ED data for opioid overdose surveillance in North Carolina. Methods We identified data on all EMS encounters in North Carolina during January 1–November 30, 2017, with documented naloxone administration and transportation to the ED. We linked these data with ED visit data in the North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool. We manually reviewed a subset of data from 12 counties to create a gold standard that informed developing iterative linkage methods using demographic, time, and destination variables. We calculated the proportion of suspected opioid overdose EMS cases that received International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for opioid overdose in the ED. Results We identified 12 088 EMS encounters of patients treated with naloxone and transported to the ED. The 12-county subset included 1781 linkage-eligible EMS encounters, with historical linkage of 65.4% (1165 of 1781) and 1.6% false linkages. Through iterative linkage methods, performance improved to 91.0% (1620 of 1781) with 0.1% false linkages. Among statewide EMS encounters with naloxone administration, the linkage improved from 47.1% to 91.1%. We found diagnosis codes for opioid overdose in the ED among 27.2% of statewide linked records. Practice Implications Through an iterative linkage approach, EMS–ED data linkage performance improved greatly while reducing the number of false linkages. Improved EMS–ED data linkage quality can enhance surveillance activities, inform emergency response practices, and improve quality of care through evaluating initial patient presentations, field interventions, and ultimate diagnoses.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehul D. Patel ◽  
Jane H. Brice ◽  
Kelly R. Evenson ◽  
Kathryn M. Rose ◽  
Chirayath M. Suchindran ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-257
Author(s):  
Kristy Williamson ◽  
Robert Gochman ◽  
Francesca Bullaro ◽  
Bradley Kaufman ◽  
William Krief

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document