12. Meeting of the Executive Group, Geneva, Switzerland, April 23-24, 1981

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Executive Group

scholarly journals Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID): an expert consensus-based statement

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayakumar Jayaraman ◽  
Vineet Dhar ◽  
Kevin J. Donly ◽  
Ekta Priya ◽  
Daniela P. Raggio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Reporting Guidelines ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Reporting Standards ◽  
Weighted Mean ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Research Reporting ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Executive Group

Abstract Background Reporting guidelines for different study designs are currently available to report studies with accuracy and transparency. There is a need to develop supplementary guideline items that are specific to areas within Pediatric Dentistry. This study aims to develop Reporting stAndards for research in PedIatric Dentistry (RAPID) guidelines using a pre-defined expert consensus-based Delphi process. Methods The development of the RAPID guidelines was based on the Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines. Following a comprehensive search of the literature, the Executive Group identified ten themes in Pediatric Dentistry and compiled a draft checklist of items under each theme. The themes were categorized as: General, Oral Medicine, Pathology and Radiology, Children with Special Health Care Needs, Sedation and Hospital Dentistry, Behavior Guidance, Dental Caries, Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Pulp Therapy, Traumatology, and Interceptive Orthodontics. A RAPID Delphi Group (RDG) was formed comprising of 69 members from 15 countries across six continents. Items were scored using a 9-point rating Likert scale. Items achieving a score of seven and above, marked by at least 70% of RDG members were accepted into the RAPID checklist items. Weighted mean scores were calculated for each item. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and one-way ANOVA was used to calculate the difference in the weighted mean scores between the themes. Results The final RAPID checklist comprised of 128 items that were finalized and approved by the RDG members in the online consensus meeting. The percentage for high scores (scores 7 to 9) ranged from 69.57 to 100% for individual items. The overall weighted mean score of the final items ranged from 7.51 to 8.28 (out of 9) and the difference was statistically significant between the themes (p < 0.05). Conclusions The RAPID statement provides guidance to researchers, authors, reviewers and editors, to ensure that all elements relevant to particular studies are adequately reported.

COCORP: Nevada areas, Part I and Part II

Geophysics ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 50 (11) ◽  
pp. 2281-2281
Author(s):  
S. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Dartmouth College ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Cornell University ◽  
Princeton University ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
Rice University ◽  
Executive Group ◽  
Geological Sciences ◽  
The University ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP) announces the availability of the data packages and digital tapes for two areas: Nevada area, Part 1, lines 4, 5, and 6 covering 270.1 line‐km; and Nevada area, Part II, lines 1, 2, 3, and 7 covering 273 line‐km. The costs are the costs of reproduction and shipping, only. The COCORP operation is part of the U.S. Geodynamics Program sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and funded by the National Science Foundation. The executive group of the consortium consists of representatives from Cornell University, Dartmouth College, Princeton University, Rice University, and the University of Wisconsin. Cornell University is the operating institution. The line locations for the two areas are shown in Figure 1. Also shown is Nevada line 8 which is not yet ready for distribution but which will be part of the N. Cal‐Nevada package to be issued shortly. Petty‐Ray was the contractor for the data acquisition. Processing was done on the Megaseis system at Cornell by students and staff of the Department of Geological Sciences.

COCORP: Minnesota and Arkansas Areas

Geophysics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (11) ◽  
pp. 1606-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Reproduction ◽  
Dartmouth College ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Cornell University ◽  
Princeton University ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
Executive Group ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The University ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP) announces the availability of data packages and tapes for the Minnesota and Arkansas areas for the cost of reproduction and shipping. These data were produced by COCORP whose operation is part of the U.S. Geodynamics Project sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and funded by the National Science Foundation. The executive group of the consortium consists of members from Cornell University, Dartmouth College, Princeton University, Rice University and the University of Wisconsin. Cornell University is the operating institution.

COCORP: Oklahoma Area, Part II

Geophysics ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 47 (10) ◽  
pp. 1484-1484 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Cost Of Reproduction ◽  
Dartmouth College ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Cornell University ◽  
Princeton University ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
Executive Group ◽  
The Cost ◽  
The University ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP) announces the availability of the data package and tapes for the Oklahoma area, part II, for the cost of reproduction and shipping. These data were obtained and processed by COCORP whose operation is part of the U.S. Geodynamics Project sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and funded by the National Science Foundation. The executive group of the consortium consists of members from Cornell University, Dartmouth College, Princeton University, Rice University, and the University of Wisconsin. Cornell University is the operating institution.

COCORP: Northern California‐Nevada area and Southern Appalachian area: Part III.

Geophysics ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. 2162-2163
Author(s):  
S. Kaufman
Keyword(s):  
Dartmouth College ◽  
National Academy Of Sciences ◽  
Cornell University ◽  
Princeton University ◽  
University Of Wisconsin ◽  
Southern Appalachian ◽  
Rice University ◽  
Executive Group ◽  
The University ◽  
Academy Of Sciences

The Consortium for Continental Reflection Profiling (COCORP) announces the availability of data packages and digital tapes for two areas: N. Cal‐Nevada area consisting of line 8 Nevada and line 7 California covering 282 line‐km; and Southern Appalachian area, part III, consisting of Florida lines 1, 2, and 4 and Georgia lines 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 covering 578.4 line‐km. The costs are the costs of reproduction and shipping, only. The COCORP activity is part of the U.S. Geodynamics Program sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences and funded by the National Science Foundation. The executive group of the consortium consists of representatives from Cornell University, Dartmouth College, Princeton University, Rice University, and the University of Wisconsin. Cornell University is the operating institution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document