Mechanical venous Anastomosis in Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction as an Equivalent to the Gold Standard

2017 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. E32-E36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Thorpe ◽  
Yash Patil

To define the most successful and efficient manner to perform venous microvascular anastomoses, the effectiveness of mechanical venous anastomosis in head and neck microvascular reconstruction is reviewed. Head and neck reconstruction with free flap techniques has become the norm and gold standard for large defects. This retrospective, multicenter case series of a single microvascular surgeon's experience with mechanical venous anastomoses specifically assessed the effectiveness of head and neck reconstruction and the complications associated with it. Data were collected from two separate academic centers and are reported from a consecutive series of patients over the course of 10 years. All patients underwent microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck region using venous couplers and flap survival. Flap survival was greater than 98% using mechanical venous couplers as the primary means for venous outflow in this series of 402 consecutive patients and 431 total microvascular flaps. Venous couplers were performed in every instance. The study shows that mechanical venous anastomosis provides a highly effective and efficient means for venous outflow in head and neck microvascular reconstruction, and should be considered equivalent to the gold standard suture technique, even in the most difficult cases.

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 845-848 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Lin ◽  
Jose Dutra ◽  
JAY Keni ◽  
Gregory A. Dumanian ◽  
Neil Fine ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative radiation therapy is considered a significant factor in head and neck reconstruction. STUDY AND DESIGN AND SETTING: In our consecutive series of 114 patients, 44 patients had prior head and neck irradiation. The 2 groups were compared on the basis of age, ischemic time, and flap size and were found not to be statistically different. The average ischemic time for the irradiated group was 94.1 minutes, and the average was 102.8 minutes for the nonirradiated group. The average flap size for the irradiated group was 69.5 cm 2 , and was 72.0 cm 2 , for the nonirradiated group. RESULTS: Using a single-factor analysis of variance, the 2 groups did not differ statistically. The overall major flap complication rate for both irradiated and nonirradiated groups was approximately 10%. CONCLUSION: Microvascular reconstruction was accomplished in both irradiated and nonirradiated head and neck patients, with a 99% total flap survival rate and a 10% major flap complication rate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 2513826X2110224
Author(s):  
Ryo Yamochi ◽  
Toshiaki Numajiri ◽  
Syoko Tsujiko ◽  
Hiroko Nakamura ◽  
Daiki Morita ◽  
...  

Free jejunal flap transfer is common in head and neck reconstruction, but necrosis remains a complication. A 77-year-old man underwent total pharyngo-laryngo-esophagectomy, bilateral neck dissection, and free jejunal flap transfer. We anastomosed 3 arteries (facial, transverse cervical, and superior thyroid) and 1 vein (jejunal) because the recipient site’s arterial status was poor. On day 2, ultrasonography and visualization revealed that the anastomosed vein was obstructed in the cranial jejunum but the remainder was viable. The region recovered by day 7 and the patient began oral intake on day 30. Ultrasonography revealed that the anastomosed jejunal vein showed no waveform, the facial and transverse cervical arteries showed arterial waveforms, and the superior thyroid artery showed a retrograde venous waveform. The flap had survived because the blood exited through the superior thyroid artery and vein. Thus, additional vascular and arterial anastomoses are options for free flap survival if the vascular status is poor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (02) ◽  
pp. 118-123
Author(s):  
Rajan Arora ◽  
Kripa Shanker Mishra ◽  
Hemant T. Bhoye ◽  
Ajay Kumar Dewan ◽  
Ravi K. Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background There is a steep learning curve to attain a consistently good result in microvascular surgery. The venous anastomosis is a critical step in free-tissue transfer. The margin of error is less and the outcome depends on the surgeon’s skill and technique. Mechanical anastomotic coupling device (MACD) has been proven to be an effective alternative to hand-sewn (HS) technique for venous anastomosis, as it requires lesser skill. However, its feasibility of application in emerging economy countries is yet to be established. Material and Method We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who underwent free-tissue transfer for head and neck reconstruction between July 2015 and October 2020. Based on the technique used for the venous anastomosis, the patients were divided into an HS technique and MACD group. Patient characteristics and outcomes were measured. Result A total of 1694 venous anastomoses were performed during the study period. There were 966 patients in the HS technique group and 719 in the MACD group. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of age, sex, prior radiotherapy, prior surgery, and comorbidities. Venous thrombosis was noted in 62 (6.4%) patients in the HS technique group and 7 (0.97%) in the MACD group (p = 0.000). The mean time taken for venous anastomosis in the HS group was 17 ± 4 minutes, and in the MACD group, it was 5 ± 2 minutes (p = 0.0001). Twenty-five (2.56%) patients in the HS group and 4 (0.55%) patients in MACD group had flap loss (p = 0.001). Conclusion MACD is an effective alternative for HS technique for venous anastomosis. There is a significant reduction in anastomosis time, flap loss, and return to operation theater due to venous thrombosis. MACD reduces the surgeon’s strain, especially in a high-volume center. Prospective randomized studies including economic analysis are required to prove the cost-effectiveness of coupler devices.


2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (8) ◽  
pp. 1915-1921
Author(s):  
Shuo Liu ◽  
Wen-bo Zhang ◽  
Yao Yu ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Chi Mao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Boczar ◽  
Ricardo Rodriguez Colon ◽  
Lavinia Anzai ◽  
David A. Daar ◽  
Bachar F. Chaya ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hope Xu ◽  
Leila Jazayeri ◽  
Evan Matros ◽  
Peter W. Henderson

AbstractSuccessful microvascular reconstruction of head and neck defects requires the ability to safely identify, isolate, and utilize recipient vessels. To date, however, a comprehensive review of the anatomy and techniques relevant to the available anatomic regions has not been undertaken. This review covers the relevant clinical anatomy of the anterior triangle, posterior triangle, submandibular region, intraoral region, preauricular region, chest, and arm, taking particular care to highlight the structures that are crucial to identify while performing each dissection. Finally, a step-by-step technique for safely dissecting the recipient vessels at each site is provided.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document