scholarly journals Balloon Catheter Technology in Rhinology: Reviewing the Evidence

2011 ◽  
Vol 145 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. P34-P35
Author(s):  
Pete S. Batra ◽  
Bradley F. Marple ◽  
Matthew W. Ryan ◽  
Raj Sindwani
2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 290-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Bolger ◽  
Winston C. Vaughan

Background Over the past 20 years, many patients have benefited from endoscopic sinus surgery and its ability to relieve sinus obstruction. However, problems still occur with surgery, thereby leaving room for innovation. Recently, catheter-based technology has provided new options for treating cardiac, vascular, and urologic diseases. We speculated that catheter technology also might offer new treatment options for sinusitis patients. The purpose of this investigation was to explore the feasibility and safety of catheter-based technology to relieve sinus ostial obstruction. Methods Anatomic models and human cadaver specimens were used initially to design and iterate catheters to open sinus ostial drainage pathways. Thereafter, the safety of balloon-catheter dilation was evaluated in six human cadaver heads. CT scan obtained before and after catheter ostial dilation was analyzed for evidence of catheter-induced trauma. Dilated ostia also were examined by endoscopy and gross anatomic dissection for unwanted catheter-induced trauma. Results Catheters successfully dilated 31 of 31 ostia, including 9 maxillary, 11 sphenoid, and 11 frontal ostia/recesses. CT scan, endoscopy, and gross anatomic dissection revealed that such dilation did not cause trauma to surrounding structures such as the orbit or skull base. Mucosal trauma imparted by catheter dilation appeared to be less than that normally seen with standard endoscopic instruments. Conclusion This initial study suggests that catheter technology can be used to dilate sinus ostia safely. Mucosal preservation and ease of use make catheters an attractive minimally invasive treatment strategy. Additional testing in patients is indicated to gain additional safety information and to explore the usefulness of catheter-based technology.


2012 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 480-481
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Tami ◽  
Jeffrey Cutler ◽  
James Atkins

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 389-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh A. Halderman ◽  
Janalee Stokken ◽  
Suhael R. Momin ◽  
Timothy L. Smith ◽  
Raj Sindwani

2012 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-483
Author(s):  
Pete S. Batra ◽  
Matthew W. Ryan ◽  
Bradley F. Marple ◽  
Raj Sindwani

2010 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 226-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pete S. Batra ◽  
Matthew W. Ryan ◽  
Raj Sindwani ◽  
Bradley F. Marple

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 573-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian D’Anza ◽  
Raj Sindwani ◽  
Troy D. Woodard

2007 ◽  
Vol 137 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
William E. Bolger ◽  
Christopher L. Brown ◽  
Christopher A. Church ◽  
Andrew N. Goldberg ◽  
Boris Karanfilov ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to further evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon catheter devices to dilate obstructed sinus ostia/perform sinusotomy. METHODS: Through a prospective, multicenter evaluation, safety was assessed by rate of adverse events, patency was determined by endoscopic examination, and sinus symptoms were determined by the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT 20). RESULTS: At the conclusion of the 24-week analysis, endoscopy determined that the sinusotomy was patent in 80.5% (247 of 307) sinuses and nonpatent in 1.6% (5 of 307), and could not determine ostial patency status in 17.9% (55 of 307). Of the ostia visualized on endoscopy, 98% were patent (247 of 252), while 2% (5 of 252) were considered nonpatent. SNOT 20 scores showed consistent symptomatic improvement over baseline. Revision treatment was required in 3 sinuses (3 of 307 sinuses, 0.98%) in 3 patients (3 of 109 patients, 2.75%). CONCLUSION: Balloon catheter technology appears safe and effective in relieving ostial obstruction. Patients were pleased and indicated that they experienced symptomatic improvement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document