Effect of Posterolateral Bundle Graft Fixation Angles on Clinical Outcomes in Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 1157-1164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Koga ◽  
Takeshi Muneta ◽  
Kazuyoshi Yagishita ◽  
Toshifumi Watanabe ◽  
Tomoyuki Mochizuki ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1548-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Ferretti ◽  
Edoardo Monaco ◽  
Luca Labianca ◽  
Angelo De Carli ◽  
Barbara Maestri ◽  
...  

Background Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction seems to be insufficient to control a combined rotatory load of internal and valgus torque, whereas anatomical double-bundle reconstruction might produce a better biomechanical outcome, especially during rotatory loads. Hypothesis The addition of the posterolateral bundle to the anteromedial bundle, in an in vivo double-bundle computer-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, is able to reduce the internal rotation of the tibia at different degrees of flexion. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Ten consecutive anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures were performed in male patients using double-bundle gracilis and semitendinosus tendon graft with the 2.0 OrthoPilot anterior cruciate ligament navigation system. Anteroposterior displacement at 30°, 60°, and 90° as well as internal and external rotation at 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion were evaluated before reconstruction, after fixation of the anteromedial bundle, and then after fixation of the posterolateral bundle. Results Fixation of the anteromedial bundle significantly (P <. 05) reduced the anteroposterior displacement at 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion; the internal rotation at 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°; and the external rotation at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°. The addition of the posterolateral bundle to the anteromedial bundle did not significantly reduce internal and external rotation of the tibia at degrees of flexion measured (P >. 05). Conclusion The hypothesis that the addition of the posterolateral bundle to the anteromedial bundle is able to reduce internal rotation of the tibia, minimizing the pivot-shift phenomenon, was not confirmed. Clinical Relevance The effective role of the anatomical double-bundle procedure in better restoring knee kinematics and allowing better clinical outcomes should be questioned in an in vivo model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using doubled semitendinosus and gracilis graft.


2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1705-1711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Kyoo Song ◽  
Luke S. Oh ◽  
Thomas J. Gill ◽  
Guoan Li ◽  
Hemanth R. Gadikota ◽  
...  

Background The intent of double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is to reproduce the normal anterior cruciate ligament anatomy and improve knee joint rotational stability. However, no consensus has been reached on the advantages of this technique over the single-bundle technique. Hypothesis We hypothesized that double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction could provide better intraoperative stability and clinical outcome than single-bundle reconstruction. Type of study: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods Forty patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury in one knee were recruited; 20 were allocated to a double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group and 20 to a single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction group. Intraoperative stabilities at 30° of knee flexion were compared between the 2 groups using a navigation system. Clinical outcomes including Lysholm knee scores, Tegner activity scores, Lachman and pivot-shift test results, and radiographic stabilities were also compared between the 2 groups after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Results Intraoperative anterior and rotational stabilities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the double-bundle group were significantly better than those in single-bundle group (P = .020 and P < .001, respectively). Nineteen patients (95%) in each group were available at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes including Lysholm knee and Tegner activity scores were similar in the 2 groups at 2-year follow-up (P > .05). Furthermore, stability results of the Lachman and pivot-shift tests, and radiologic findings at 2-year follow-up failed to reveal any significant intergroup differences (P > .05). Conclusion Although double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction produces better intraoperative stabilities than single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the 2 modalities were found to be similar in terms of clinical outcomes and postoperative stabilities after a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document