Consent to Treat: Clinical and Legal Implications

1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Manchanda ◽  
M.L.D. Fernando ◽  
D.A. Galbraith

Procedural requirements under the provisions of the Mental Health Act can delay the implementation of treatment for an involuntary psychiatric patient refusing treatment. The authors present such a case where treatment could not be given for nearly two months during which the patient's condition sharply deteriorated. With treatment, the patient improved within two weeks and was allowed to go home. Considerable time and money was spent in the Regional Review Board hearings. The implications of the case are discussed and it is recommended that steps be taken to prevent the interference of a bureaucratic legal system in the day to day practice of psychiatry.

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan Seppänen ◽  
Markku Eronen

A tradition of Romano-Germanic or civil law defines the legal system in Finland. Laws of relevance to psychiatry are the 1990 Mental Health Act and, insofar as it pertains to forensic psychiatry, the Criminal Law (1889) and the Law on State Mental Hospitals (1987, revised 1997). These are outlined in the present paper.


Author(s):  
Simon Foster

The case concerns the right of a psychiatric patient to choose to die by refusing intervention from the hospital. The Court considered the treatment provisions of Part IV of the Mental Health Act, capacity at common law and the legitimate interests of society in preserving life. However the notoriety of Mr Brady, and his own personality, meant that underlying the judgment were considerations of public policy as much as legal analysis.


Author(s):  
Rachel Churchill ◽  
Sharon Wall ◽  
Matthew Hotopf ◽  
Alec Buchanan ◽  
Simon Wessely

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document