scholarly journals The Failure of Recall to Prison: Early Release, Front-Door and Back-Door Sentencing and the Revolving Prison Door in Scotland

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beth Weaver ◽  
Cyrus Tata ◽  
Mary Munro ◽  
Monica Barry
Keyword(s):  
2003 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Slonaker ◽  
Ann C. Wendt ◽  
Scott David Williams

2021 ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
S. Ramakrishnan ◽  
P. C. Ramakrishna ◽  
& Malini Seshadri
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-76
Author(s):  
Givi Mikanadze

A smoothly operating early release system is an important instrument in combating prison overcrowding. Timely preparation for early release plays a key role in establishing fair and humane treatment of those convicts considered ready to return to society. Early conditional release is regarded as one of the most effective and constructive measures, as it not only reduces the length of imprisonment, but also contributes substantially to a planned return of the offender to the community. High rates of imprisonment make various approaches to parole and early release worthy of review, especially concerning how this so-called “back door” mechanism operates in new independent states — in this case, Georgia and Armenia - and how it provides a fair, equal and transparent process to obtain early release from custody. Although Georgia and Armenia are neighbouring countries with similar historical and developmental backgrounds, the parole systems established in these states are totally different. This article aims to review the parole systems of Georgia and Armenia and provide comparative analyses in the context of standards set by the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation (2003)22 on conditional release (parole).


2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Seislove
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 69 (10) ◽  
pp. S60-2
Author(s):  
C L Elam ◽  
M M Johnson
Keyword(s):  

Antiquity ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 56 (218) ◽  
pp. 181-188
Author(s):  
Seton Lloyd
Keyword(s):  

Almost half-a-century ago, I was once referred to by Sidney Smith as someone who had entered archaeology 'by the back door'. In those days there was no well-defined 'front door', though Smith and others were doing their best to create one; and, since I was myself then already well established in a more conventional profession, the implied reproof was perhaps justifiable. In truth, the potential advantages of an architectural training to a field archaeologist were not at that time fully understood, and one purpose of the present writing is to make their significance more apparent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document