scholarly journals Copers and Noncopers Use Different Landing Techniques to Limit Anterior Tibial Translation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712199806
Author(s):  
Michèle N.J. Keizer ◽  
Egbert Otten ◽  
Chantal M.I. Beijersbergen ◽  
Reinoud W. Brouwer ◽  
Juha M. Hijmans
Keyword(s):  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Return To Sports ◽  
Beighton Score ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Flexion Moment ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibial Translation

Background: At 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), two-thirds of patients manage to return to sports (copers), whereas one-third of patients do not return to sports (noncopers). Copers and noncopers have different muscle activation patterns, and noncopers may not be able to control dynamic anterior tibial translation (ATTd) as well as copers. Purpose/Hypothesis: To investigate whether (1) there is a positive correlation between passive ATT (ATTp; ie, general joint laxity) and ATTd during jump landing, (2) whether ATTd is moderated by muscle activating patterns, and (3) whether there is a difference in moderating ATTd between copers and noncopers. We hypothesized that patients who have undergone ACLR compensate for ATTd by developing muscle strategies that are more effective in copers compared with noncopers. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 40 patients who underwent unilateral ACLR performed 10 single-leg hops for distance with both legs. Lower body kinematic and kinetic data were measured using a motion-capture system, and ATTd was determined with an embedded method. Muscle activity was measured using electromyographic signals. Bilateral ATTp was measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer. In addition, the Beighton score was obtained. Results: There was no significant correlation between ATTp and ATTd in copers; however, there was a positive correlation between ATTp and ATTd in the operated knee of noncopers. There was a positive correlation between the Beighton score and ATTp as well as between the Beighton score and ATTd in both copers and noncopers in the operated knee. Copers showed a negative correlation between ATTd and gastrocnemius activity in their operated leg during landing. Noncopers showed a positive correlation between ATTd and knee flexion moment in their operated knee during landing. Conclusion: Copers used increased gastrocnemius activity to reduce ATTd, whereas noncopers moderated ATTd by generating a smaller knee flexion moment. Clinical Relevance: This study showed that copers used different landing techniques than noncopers. Patients who returned to sports after ACLR had sufficient plantar flexor activation to limit ATTd.

The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Knee Joint Kinematics under Simulated Muscle Loads

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Doo Yoo ◽  
Ramprasad Papannagari ◽  
Sang Eun Park ◽  
Louis E. DeFrate ◽  
Thomas J. Gill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibial Translation ◽  
Reconstructed Knee

Background Numerous studies have investigated anterior stability of the knee during the anterior drawer test after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Few studies have evaluated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under physiological loads. Purpose To determine whether anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reproduced knee motion under simulated muscle loads. Study Design Controlled laboratory study. Methods Eight human cadaveric knees were tested with the anterior cruciate ligament intact, transected, and reconstructed (using a bone–patellar tendon–bone graft) on a robotic testing system. Tibial translation and rotation were measured at 0 °, 15 °, 30 °, 60 °, and 90 ° of flexion under anterior drawer loading (130 N), quadriceps muscle loading (400 N), and combined quadriceps and hamstring muscle loading (400 N and 200 N, respectively). Repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls test were used to detect statistically significant differences between knee states. Results Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction resulted in a clinically satisfactory anterior tibial translation. The anterior tibial translation of the reconstructed knee was 1.93 mm larger than the intact knee at 30 ° of flexion under anterior load. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction overconstrained tibial rotation, causing significantly less internal tibial rotation in the reconstructed knee at low flexion angles (0 °-30 °) under muscle loads (P<. 05). At 30 ° of flexion, under muscle loads, the tibia of the reconstructed knee was 1.9 ° externally rotated compared to the intact knee. Conclusions Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may not restore the rotational kinematics of the intact knee under muscle loads, even though anterior tibial translation was restored to a clinically satisfactory level under anterior drawer loads. These data suggest that reproducing anterior stability under anterior tibial loads may not ensure that knee joint kinematics is restored under physiological loading conditions. Clinical Relevance Decreased internal rotation of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction may lead to increased patellofemoral joint contact pressures. Future anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques should aim at restoring 3-dimensional knee kinematics under physiological loads.

A Biomechanical Evaluation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Response to Rotational Loads

2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Zeminski ◽  
Akihiro Kanamori ◽  
Masayoshi Yagi ◽  
Richard E. Debski ◽  
Freddie H. Fu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Complex Loading ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Anterior Tibial ◽  
Biomechanical Evaluation ◽  
Anterior Cruciate ◽  
Tibial Translation

Abstract A successful reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) after its injury should restore the kinematics of the intact knee, as well as reproduce the in-situ force in this ligament. While ACL reconstruction has been successful to limit anterior tibial translation under anterior loads applied to the tibia (1, 2), the same cannot be said about more complex loading conditions that include valgus and internal tibial torques.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document