Efficacy and safety of erenumab in Japanese migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure or concomitant preventive treatment: subgroup analyses of a phase 3, randomized trial

Abstract Background These subgroup analyses of a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of erenumab 70 mg in Japanese migraine patients with/without prior preventive treatment failure(s) (“failed-yes” and “failed-no” subgroups) and with/without concomitant preventive treatment (“concomitant preventive-yes” and “concomitant preventive-no” subgroups). Methods Overall, 261 patients were randomized; 130 and 131 patients to erenumab 70 mg and placebo, respectively. Subgroup analyses evaluated the change from baseline to Months 4–6 in mean monthly migraine days (MMD) (primary endpoint), achievement of a ≥50% reduction in mean MMD, and change from baseline in mean monthly acute migraine-specific medication (MSM) treatment days. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also evaluated. Results Of the 261 patients randomized, 117 (44.8%) and 92 (35.3%) patients were in the failed-yes and concomitant preventive-yes subgroups, respectively. Erenumab 70 mg demonstrated consistent efficacy across all subgroups, with greater reductions from baseline in mean MMD versus placebo at Months 4–6 (treatment difference versus placebo [95% CI], failed-yes: − 1.9 [− 3.3, − 0.4]; failed-no: − 1.4 [− 2.6, − 0.3]; concomitant preventive-yes: − 1.7 [− 3.3, 0.0]; concomitant preventive-no: − 1.6 [− 2.6, − 0.5]). Similar results were seen for achievement of ≥50% reduction in mean MMD and change from baseline in mean monthly acute MSM treatment days. The safety profile of erenumab 70 mg was similar across subgroups, and similar to placebo in each subgroup. Conclusion Erenumab was associated with clinically relevant improvements in all efficacy endpoints and was well tolerated across all subgroups of Japanese migraine patients with/without prior preventive treatment failure(s) and with/without concomitant preventive treatment. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT03812224. Registered January 23, 2019.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Cephalalgia ◽

10.1177/0333102418788347 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 38 (10) ◽

pp. 1611-1621 ◽

Cited By ~ 44

Author(s):

Messoud Ashina ◽

Stewart Tepper ◽

Jan Lewis Brandes ◽

Uwe Reuter ◽

Guy Boudreau ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Migraine ◽

Preventive Treatment ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Acute Migraine ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Double Blind ◽

Double Blind Placebo ◽

Safety Issues ◽

Subgroup Analyses ◽

Specific Medication

Background Erenumab was effective and well tolerated in a pivotal clinical trial of chronic migraine. Here, we evaluated efficacy and safety of monthly erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) versus placebo in the subgroup of patients who had previously failed preventive treatment(s) (≥ 1, ≥ 2 prior failed medication categories) and in patients who had never failed. Methods Subgroup analyses evaluated change from baseline in monthly migraine days; achievement of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% reduction in monthly migraine days; and change in monthly acute migraine-specific medication days. Adverse events were evaluated for each subgroup. Results Treatment with both doses of erenumab resulted in greater reductions in monthly migraine days (primary endpoint) at Month 3 (treatment difference [95% CI], never failed subgroup: −2.2 [−4.1, −0.3] for 70 mg and −0.5 [−2.4, 1.5] for 140 mg; ≥ 1 prior failed medication categories subgroup: −2.5 [−3.8, −1.2], for 70 mg and −3.3 [−4.6, −2.1] for 140 mg; ≥ 2 prior failed medication categories subgroup: −2.7 [−4.2, −1.2], for 70 mg and −4.3 [−5.8, −2.8] for 140 mg). Similar results were observed in the monthly acute migraine-specific medication days endpoint, and in the achievement of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% reduction in monthly migraine days. There were no new or unexpected safety issues. Conclusion Erenumab showed consistent efficacy in chronic migraine patients who had failed prior preventive treatments and was well tolerated across subgroups.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Cephalalgia ◽

10.1177/0333102419835459 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 39 (7) ◽

pp. 817-826 ◽

Cited By ~ 12

Author(s):

Peter J Goadsby ◽

Koen Paemeleire ◽

Gregor Broessner ◽

Jan Brandes ◽

Jan Klatt ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Placebo Response ◽

Preventive Treatment ◽

Episodic Migraine ◽

Prior Treatment ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Study Phase ◽

Acute Migraine ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Double Blind ◽

Specific Medication

Background Erenumab was effective and well tolerated in a pivotal clinical trial of episodic migraine that included subjects both naïve to, and those who had failed, previous preventives. Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety of erenumab (70 mg or 140 mg) versus placebo in the subgroup of patients who had previously failed preventive treatment(s): ≥1 or ≥2 prior failed migraine preventive categories, and in patients who had never failed. Methods Prespecified subgroup analyses evaluated change from baseline to months 4–6 (the primary endpoint of the blinded study phase) in monthly migraine days, achievement of ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days, and change from baseline in acute migraine-specific medication days. Adverse events were also evaluated. Results Treatment with both doses of erenumab resulted in greater reductions in monthly migraine days at months 4–6 (treatment difference versus placebo [95% CI], never failed subgroup: −0.9 [−1.5, −0.3] for 70 mg and −1.3 [−1.9, −0.7] for 140 mg; ≥1 prior failed medication categories subgroup: −2.0 [−2.8, −1.2] for 70 mg and −2.5 [−3.4, −1.7] for 140 mg; ≥2 prior failed medication categories subgroup: −1.3 [−2.6, 0.0] for 70 mg and −2.7 [−4.0, −1.4] for 140 mg). Similar results were observed in the monthly acute migraine-specific medication days endpoint, and in the achievement of ≥50% and ≥75% reduction in monthly migraine days. For the ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine day endpoint, placebo response in the no prior treatment failed group was 32.6%, in the ≥1 failed treatment 17.5%, and in the ≥2 failed treatments 11.1%. Conclusion Erenumab showed consistent efficacy in episodic migraine patients who had failed prior preventive treatments and was well tolerated across subgroups. The data suggest prior patients with prior treatment failures have lower placebo response rates.

Download Full-text