scholarly journals A comparison of two emergency medical dispatch protocols with respect to accuracy

Author(s):  
Klara Torlén ◽  
Lisa Kurland ◽  
Maaret Castrén ◽  
Knut Olanders ◽  
Katarina Bohm
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Molly McCann-Pineo ◽  
Timmy Li ◽  
Paul Barbara ◽  
Brian Levinsky ◽  
James Debono ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linn Andelius ◽  
Carolina Malta Hansen ◽  
Freddy Lippert ◽  
Lena Karlsson ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  

Introduction: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is dependent on early defibrillation. To increase bystander defibrillation in OHCAs, a first-responder program dispatching lay rescuers (Heart Runners) through a smartphone application (Heart Runner-app) was implemented in the Capital Region of Denmark. We investigated the proportion of Heart Runners arriving prior to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and rates of bystander defibrillation. Methods: The Capital Region of Denmark comprises 1.8 mil. inhabitants and 19,048 Heart Runners were registered. In cases of suspected OHCA, the Heart Runner-app was activated by the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center. Up to 20 Heart Runners < 1.8 km from the OHCA were dispatched to either start cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or to retrieve and use a publicly accessible automated external defibrillator (AED). Through an electronic survey, Heart Runners reported if they arrived before EMS and if they applied an AED. OHCAs where at least one Heart Runner arrived before EMS were compared with OHCAs where EMS arrived first. All OHCAs from September 2017 to May 2018, where Heart Runners had been dispatched, were included. Results: Of 399 EMS treated OHCAs, 78% (n=313/399) had a matching survey. A Heart Runner arrived before EMS in 47% (n=147/313) of the cases, and applied an AED in 41% (n=61/147) of these cases. Rate of bystander defibrillation was 2.5-fold higher compared to cases where the EMS arrived first (Table 1). Conclusions: By activation of the Heart Runner-app, Heart Runners arrived prior to EMS in nearly half of all the OHCA cases. Bystander defibrillation rate was significantly higher when Heart Runners arrived prior to EMS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 683-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel Gardett ◽  
Meghan Broadbent ◽  
Greg Scott ◽  
Jeff J. Clawson ◽  
Christopher Olola

Author(s):  
Ian R. Drennan ◽  
Guillaume Geri ◽  
Steve Brooks ◽  
Keith Couper ◽  
Tetsuo Hatanaka ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Montassier ◽  
Julien Labady ◽  
Antoine Andre ◽  
Gilles Potel ◽  
Frederic Berthier ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Robert Larribau ◽  
Victor Nathan Chappuis ◽  
Philippe Cottet ◽  
Simon Regard ◽  
Hélène Deham ◽  
...  

Background: Measuring the performance of emergency medical dispatch tools used in paramedic-staffed emergency medical communication centres (EMCCs) is rarely performed. The objectives of our study were, therefore, to measure the performance and accuracy of Geneva’s dispatch system based on symptom assessment, in particular, the performance of ambulance dispatching with lights and sirens (L&S) and to measure the effect of adding specific protocols for each symptom. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study including all emergency calls received at Geneva’s EMCC (Switzerland) from 1 January 2014 to 1 July 2019. The risk levels selected during the emergency calls were compared to a reference standard, based on the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) scale, dichotomized to severe patient condition (NACA ≥ 4) or stable patient condition (NACA < 4) in the field. The symptom-based dispatch performance was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Contingency tables and a Fagan nomogram were used to measure the performance of the dispatch with or without L&S. Measurements were carried out by symptom, and a group of symptoms with specific protocols was compared to a group without specific protocols. Results: We found an acceptable area under the ROC curve of 0.7474, 95%CI (0.7448–0.7503) for the 148,979 assessments included in the study. Where the severity prevalence was 21%, 95%CI (20.8–21.2). The sensitivity of the L&S dispatch was 87.5%, 95%CI (87.1–87.8); and the specificity was 47.3%, 95%CI (47.0–47.6). When symptom-specific assessment protocols were used, the accuracy of the assessments was slightly improved. Conclusions: Performance measurement of Geneva’s symptom-based dispatch system using standard diagnostic test performance measurement tools was possible. The performance was found to be comparable to other emergency medical dispatch systems using the same reference standard. However, the implementation of specific assessment protocols for each symptom may improve the accuracy of symptom-based dispatch systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document