Lymphocyte Transformation Induced by Autologous Cells XVI

2020 ◽  
pp. 123-133
Author(s):  
Marc E. Weksler ◽  
Michael Durante ◽  
David Tak Yan Yu
Keyword(s):  
Lymphocyte Transformation

Diagnostic methods for confirming drug-allergy – the lymphocyte transformation test in dermatology

2008 ◽  
Vol 149 (24) ◽  
pp. 1107-1114
Author(s):  
Sarolta Makó ◽  
Réka Lepesi-Benkő ◽  
Márta Marschalkó ◽  
Gyöngyvér Soós ◽  
Sarolta Kárpáti
Keyword(s):  
Drug Allergy ◽  
Lymphocyte Transformation ◽  
Lymphocyte Transformation Test ◽  
Diagnostic Methods

A gyógyszermellékhatások felismerése és a tüneteket kiváltó gyógyszer oki szerepének bizonyítása komoly felkészültséget igényel. E közlemény célja a gyógyszerallergiás reakciók diagnosztikai lehetőségeinek rövid áttekintése és a lymphocytatranszformációs teszt gyógyszer-hiperszenzitivitási reakciókban való bizonyító szerepének bőrgyógyászati szempontok szerinti értékelése. A lymphocytatranszformációs teszt azon a megfigyelésen alapul, hogy a gyógyszerrel való első találkozáskor kialakult antigénspecifikus T-sejtek osztódni kezdenek az antigénnel való in vitro megismételt találkozás után. A szenzibilizációt az osztódó T-sejtekbe történő 3 H-timidin-beépülés mértéke jelzi. A hatóanyag-specifikus T-sejtek szinte mindig részt vesznek a gyógyszerallergiás reakciókban, ezért a vizsgálat előnye, hogy sok gyógyszernél és különböző immunreakciók eseteiben egyaránt jól alkalmazható. Hátránya a munkaigényesség, valamint az, hogy specificitásának és szenzitivitásának bizonyításához hiányoznak a széles körű, nagy beteganyagon elvégzett tanulmányok. Emiatt a teszt nem egyértelműen elfogadott a gyógyszerallergia igazolására. Hiányosságai ellenére azonban, jobb prediktív értékű egyéb vizsgálatok hiányában, a lymphocytatranszformációs tesztnek fontos szerepe van a gyógyszerallergiák diagnosztizálása terén.

Role of in vivo and in vitro Tests in the Diagnosis of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (SCAR) to Drug

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 3872-3880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel M. Bergmann ◽  
Jean-Christoph Caubet
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Lymphocyte Transformation ◽  
Stevens Johnson Syndrome ◽  
In Vitro Tests ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Patch Tests ◽  
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions ◽  
Cutaneous Adverse Reactions

Severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCAR) are life-threatening conditions including acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Diagnosis of causative underlying drug hypersensitivity (DH) is mandatory due to the high morbidity and mortality upon re-exposure with the incriminated drug. If an underlying DH is suspected, in vivo test, including patch tests (PTs), delayed-reading intradermal tests (IDTs) and in vitro tests can be performed in selected patients for which the suspected culprit drug is mandatory, or in order to find a safe alternative treatment. Positivity of in vivo and in vitro tests in SCAR to drug varies depending on the type of reaction and the incriminated drugs. Due to the severe nature of these reactions, drug provocation test (DPT) is highly contraindicated in patients who experienced SCAR. Thus, sensitivity is based on positive test results in patients with a suggestive clinical history. Patch tests still remain the first-line diagnostic tests in the majority of patients with SCAR, followed, in case of negative results, by delayed-reading IDTs, with the exception of patients with bullous diseases where IDTs are still contra-indicated. In vitro tests have shown promising results in the diagnosis of SCAR to drug. Positivity is particularly high when the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) is combined with cytokines and cytotoxic markers measurement (cyto-LTT), but this still has to be confirmed with larger studies. Due to the rarity of SCAR, large multi-center collaborative studies are needed to better study the sensitivity and specificity of in vivo and in vitro tests.

scholarly journals TO010A NEW IMMUN-TOXICOLOGICAL TEST TO DETECT POLYSULFONE HYPERSENSITIVITY IN HEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Beige ◽  
Ralph Wendt ◽  
Despina Rüssmann ◽  
Karl-Peter Ringel
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Lymphocyte Transformation ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Lymphocyte Transformation Test ◽  
Laboratory Research ◽  
Humoral Immune ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Positive Results

Abstract Background and Aims Incompatibility of dialysis procedure due to hypersensitivity against dialyzer material which currently is mainly based on polysulfone and derivatives can not be assessed by routine laboratory tests. Although the frequency of such symptoms is suspected to be low (below 2%) such resembles an important clinical problem because dialysis procedures are frequently accompanied by symptoms of non-tolerability with reasons not being entirely clear while circulatory reasons are suspected to play a major role. Method To enlighten the role of polysulfone hypersensitivity, we adapted known standardized material immune-toxicological tests (lymphocyte transformation test, basophil degranulation test) to the specific conditions of dialysis and polysulfone material sensitivity. We developed a method of polysulfone micronisation and measured humoral immune response of isolated patient´s lymphocytes when incubated with polysulfone dispersion. Results 39 samples from 103 patients with suspected polysulfone hypersensitivity showed positive results for type 1 (n=19), type 4 (n=18) or both type (n=2) reactions. There were no significant differences in the level of stimulation measured for DI, SI and lymphogenesis before and after dialysis (average delta -0.4; -0.28; - 1.74, p = 0.71; 0.34; 0.37) and with different dialyzer materials (Tab. 1). Patients with pos. type 4 results (LTT and lymphogenesis) showed highly correlated results in either LTT or lymphogenesis test (Fig. 1, R=0.87, p<0.0001). 8 out of 8 samples from patients with repeated test on different PS showed positive results on either PS. One patient tested positive on PS showed no hypersensitivity with another non-PS (PMMA) material. Conclusion This is the first methodological report showing plausible in-vitro results of patients samples concerning polysulfone intolerance. On the first superficial view, a “false-negative” rate of 60% looks rather disappointing, because all samples derived from patients with suspicion of PS hypersensitivity. However, due to the clinical variability of intolerance symptoms and the high prevalence of any problems after HD initiation, mainly of circulatory origin after initiating extracorporeal circuit, this rate may obviously express the true frequency of isolated PS material hypersensitivity in suspected patients. Alternative pathophysiological pathways of material sensitivity like complement activation, remain to be elucidated and incorporated into a comprehensive future testing panel. Further clinical and laboratory research is needed to define true polysulfone hypersensitivity and to enlighten the field of hypothetic subclinical material incompatibility in patients with impaired dialysis tolerability.

SPERM-INDUCED LYMPHOCYTE TRANSFORMATION

The Lancet ◽  
1974 ◽  
Vol 304 (7886) ◽  
pp. 954-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
WilliamR. Levis ◽  
JohnJ. Whalen ◽  
RichardJ. Sherins
Keyword(s):  
Lymphocyte Transformation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document