Survival Analysis with Competing Risks and Semi-competing Risks Data

2017 ◽  
pp. 105-117
Author(s):  
Ruosha Li ◽  
Limin Peng
Author(s):  
Paul C. Lambert

Competing risks occur in survival analysis when an individual is at risk of more than one type of event and one event's occurrence precludes another's. The cause-specific cumulative incidence function (CIF) is a measure of interest with competing-risks data. It gives the absolute (or crude) risk of having the event by time t, accounting for the fact that it is impossible to have the event if a competing event occurs first. The user-written command stcompet calculates nonparametric estimates of the cause-specific CIF, and the official Stata command stcrreg fits the Fine and Gray (1999, Journal of the American Statistical Association 94: 496–509) model for competing-risks data. Geskus (2011, Biometrics 67: 39–49) has recently shown that standard software can estimate some of the key measures in competing risks by restructuring the data and incorporating weights. This has a number of advantages because any tools developed for standard survival analysis can then be used to analyze competing-risks data. In this article, I describe the stcrprep command, which restructures the data and calculates the appropriate weights. After one uses stcrprep, a number of standard Stata survival analysis commands can then be used to analyze competing risks. For example, sts graph, failure will give a plot of the cause-specific CIF, and stcox will fit the Fine and Gray (1999) proportional subhazards model. Using stcrprep together with stcox is computationally much more efficient than using stcrreg. In addition, stcrprep opens up new opportunities for competing-risk models. I illustrate this by fitting flexible parametric survival models to the expanded data to directly model the cause-specific CIF.


2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 956-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Beyersmann ◽  
Aurélien Latouche ◽  
Anika Buchholz ◽  
Martin Schumacher

Author(s):  
Xiaolin Chen ◽  
Chenguang Li ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
Zhenlong Gao

Biometrics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Nevo ◽  
Deborah Blacker ◽  
Eric B. Larson ◽  
Sebastien Haneuse

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura L. Taylor ◽  
Edsel A. Peña

Author(s):  
Thomas H. Scheike ◽  
Klaus Kähler Holst

Familial aggregation refers to the fact that a particular disease may be overrepresented in some families due to genetic or environmental factors. When studying such phenomena, it is clear that one important aspect is the age of onset of the disease in question, and in addition, the data will typically be right-censored. Therefore, one must apply lifetime data methods to quantify such dependence and to separate it into different sources using polygenic modeling. Another important point is that the occurrence of a particular disease can be prevented by death—that is, competing risks—and therefore, the familial aggregation should be studied in a model that allows for both death and the occurrence of the disease. We here demonstrate how polygenic modeling can be done for both survival data and competing risks data dealing with right-censoring. The competing risks modeling that we focus on is closely related to the liability threshold model. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, Volume 9 is March 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document