1991 ◽  
Vol 86 (415) ◽  
pp. 828
Author(s):  
Mark P. Becker ◽  
Erling B. Anderson

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 286-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry P. Haynes

PurposeThis paper aims to establish if office occupiers, who adopt different work patterns, can be segmented based on differences of perceived productivity with regards to the physical environment and the behavioural environment.Design/methodology/approachComponents of office productivity were used in an office productivity model with categorical data enabling a unique opportunity to undertake an analysis of office occupiers by work process type.FindingsThe four distinct evaluative components used were comfort, office layout, interaction and distraction. The components were subsequently used for more detailed statistical analysis. This study establishes that statistical differences exist between the work styles under investigation.Research limitations/implicationsThis research establishes that to truly appreciate office productivity there is a need to further understand the way that people work in offices and their specific requirements. The matching of office occupier need with space provision can only be achieved if the office occupier is involved in the creation of the office solution.Originality/valueThis study demonstrates that there is a need to consider how the office environment matches the work patterns of the office occupiers. This understanding of how the office works could be considered as establishing the office landscape or “officescape”.


2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (450) ◽  
pp. 680
Author(s):  
Joseph B. Lang ◽  
Christopher J. Lloyd

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document