The Drain Tube of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway Can Be Used As a Basic Monitor

2008 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 1087
Author(s):  
Masao Yamashita
2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mitchell ◽  
J. Brimacombe ◽  
C. Keller

We determined the feasibility, accuracy and optimal location of oesophageal core temperature measurements using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway drain tube. Thirty normothermic anaesthetized ventilated adults (ASA 1 to 2, aged 18 to 80 years) were studied. Temperatures were recorded using a thermistor at six different locations (middle of drain tube and at 0 to 20 cm distal to the drain tube in 5 cm increments) and compared to nasopharyngeal (thermistor) and aural (infrared tympanic thermometer) reference core temperatures. The temperature probe was successfully inserted into the oesophagus in all patients at the first attempt. Oesophageal temperature increased with depth from 0 to 5 cm (35.2 v 35.9, P<0.0001) and 5 to 10 cm (35.9 v 36.3, P<0.01), but was unchanged from 10 to 15 cm (36.3 v 36.6) and 15 to 20 cm (36.6 v 36.7). Aural temperature was higher than nasopharyngeal temperature (36.8 v 36.0, P<0.0001). Aural temperature was 0.89 to 1.59°C higher than the oesophagus at 0 to 5 cm and 0.21 to 0.30°C higher than the oesophagus at 15 to 20 cm. Nasopharyngeal temperature was 0.06 to 0.76°C higher than the oesophagus at 0 to 5 cm and 0.62 to 0.84°C lower than the oesophagus at 15 to 20 cm. The lowest temperature was in the mid-point of the drain tube (34.7). We conclude that oesophageal core temperature measurement is feasible and accurate using the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. The optimal location for the temperature probe is at 15 to 20 cm.


2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Brimacombe ◽  
Christian Keller ◽  
Dana Vosoba Judd

Background The authors compare three techniques for insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Methods Two hundred forty healthy patients aged 18-80 yr were randomly allocated for ProSeal laryngeal mask airway insertion using the digital, introducer tool (IT), or gum elastic bougie (GEB)-guided techniques. The digital and IT techniques were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The GEB-guided technique involved priming the drain tube with the GEB, placing the GEB in the esophagus under direct vision, and inserting the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway using the digital technique with the GEB as a guide. Failed insertion was defined by any of the following criteria: (1) failed pharyngeal placement; (2) malposition (air leaks, negative tap test results, or failed gastric tube insertion if pharyngeal placement was successful); and (3) ineffective ventilation (maximum expired tidal volume &lt; 8 ml/kg or end-tidal carbon dioxide &gt; 45 mmHg if correctly positioned). Any visible or occult blood was noted. Sore throat, dysphonia, and dysphagia were assessed 18-24 h postoperatively. Results Insertion was more frequently successful with the GEB-guided technique at the first attempt (GEB, 100%; digital, 88%; IT, 84%; both P &lt; 0.001), but success after three attempts was similar (GEB, 100%; digital, 99%; IT, 98%). The time taken to successful placement was similar among groups at the first attempt but was shorter for the GEB-technique after three attempts (GEB, 25 +/- 14 s; digital, 33 +/- 19 s; IT, 37 +/- 25 s; both: P &lt; 0.003). There were no differences in the frequency of visible blood, but occult blood occurred less frequently with the GEB-guided technique (GEB, 12%; digital, 29%; IT, 31%; both: P &lt; 0.02) but was similar among techniques if insertion was successful at the first attempt. There were no differences in postoperative airway morbidity. CONCLUSION The GEB-guided insertion technique is more frequently successful than the digital or IT techniques. The authors suggest that the GEB-guided technique may be a useful backup technique for when the digital and IT techniques fail.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document