scholarly journals Book Review: Anil Gupta and Nuel Belnap. The Revision Theory of Truth

1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 606-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert C. Koons
Author(s):  
Matti Eklund

In my “Deep Inconsistency” (Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2002), I compared my meaning-inconsistency view on the liar with Graham Priest’s dialetheist view, using my view to help cast doubt on Priest’s arguments for his view. Jc Beall and Priest have recently published a reply to my article (Australasian Journal of Logic, 2007). I here respond to their criticisms. In addition, I compare the meaning–inconsistency view with Anil Gupta and Nuel Belnap’s revision theory of truth, and discuss how best to deal with the strengthened liar.


1996 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 727
Author(s):  
Vann McGee ◽  
Anil Gupta ◽  
Nuel Belnap

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catrin Campbell-Moore ◽  
Leon Horsten ◽  
Hannes Leitgeb

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 642-664 ◽  
Author(s):  
LEON HORSTEN ◽  
GRAHAM E. LEIGH ◽  
HANNES LEITGEB ◽  
PHILIP WELCH

AbstractThis article explores ways in which the Revision Theory of Truth can be expressed in the object language. In particular, we investigate the extent to which semantic deficiency, stable truth, and nearly stable truth can be so expressed, and we study different axiomatic systems for the Revision Theory of Truth.


1982 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuel D. Belnap

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document