Reply to Beall and Priest
Keyword(s):
The Liar
◽
In my “Deep Inconsistency” (Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 2002), I compared my meaning-inconsistency view on the liar with Graham Priest’s dialetheist view, using my view to help cast doubt on Priest’s arguments for his view. Jc Beall and Priest have recently published a reply to my article (Australasian Journal of Logic, 2007). I here respond to their criticisms. In addition, I compare the meaning–inconsistency view with Anil Gupta and Nuel Belnap’s revision theory of truth, and discuss how best to deal with the strengthened liar.
1994 ◽
Vol 35
(4)
◽
pp. 606-631
◽
2018 ◽
Vol 48
(1)
◽
pp. 87-112
◽
2012 ◽
Vol 5
(4)
◽
pp. 642-664
◽
1995 ◽
Vol 36
(3)
◽
pp. 165-173
◽
1982 ◽
Vol 11
(1)
◽
pp. 103-116
◽