Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal by John P. Bowes

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 753-756
Author(s):  
Natalie Joy
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

John P. Bowes. Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal.

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 842-843
Author(s):  
Christopher D. Haveman
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal

2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
David A. Nichols
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

Land Too Good For Indians: Northern Indian Removal by John P. Bowes

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-102
Author(s):  
Justin Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal. By John P. Bowes

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-225
Author(s):  
John W. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal by John P. Bowes

2017 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
pp. 668-670
Author(s):  
James Taylor Carson
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal by John P. Bowes

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 135-137
Author(s):  
John R. Wunder
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

“Land Too Good for Indians”: Northern Indian Removal by John P. Bowes

Ohio History ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-98
Author(s):  
Dan Griesmer
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

scholarly journals Land Too Good for Indians: Northern Indian Removal

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-222
Author(s):  
Libby Tronnes
Keyword(s):  
Indian Removal ◽  
Good For

Seti Figure of Merit

1997 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 711-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Dreher ◽  
D. Kent Cullers
Keyword(s):  
Figure Of Merit ◽  
Qualitative Difference ◽  
Current Generation ◽  
Detection Range ◽  
Sky Surveys ◽  
Independent Observations ◽  
Good For

AbstractWe develop a figure of merit for SETI observations which is anexplicitfunction of the EIRP of the transmitters, which allows us to treat sky surveys and targeted searches on the same footing. For each EIRP, we calculate the product of terms measuring the number of stars within detection range, the range of frequencies searched, and the number of independent observations for each star. For a given set of SETI observations, the result is a graph of merit versus transmitter EIRP. We apply this technique to several completed and ongoing SETI programs. The results provide a quantitative confirmation of the expected qualitative difference between sky surveys and targeted searches: the Project Phoenix targeted search is good for finding transmitters in the 109to 1014W range, while the sky surveys do their best at higher powers. Current generation optical SETI is not yet competitive with microwave SETI.

Lactamide-MEA Looks Good for Cradle Cap

2006 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
SHARON WORCESTER
Keyword(s):  
Good For
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document