scholarly journals Peter van Inwagen, Thinking about Free Will (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017), 232 pp. ISBN: 9781316617656

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (57) ◽  
pp. 280-288
Author(s):  
José Guilherme B. A. Sutil
2004 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 217-241
Author(s):  
Alfred Mele

Libertarians hold that free action and moral responsibility are incompatible with determinism and that some human beings occasionally act freely and are morally responsible for some of what they do. Can libertarians who know both that they are right and that they are free make sincere promises? Peter van Inwagen, a libertarian, contends that they cannot—at least when they assume that should they do what they promise to do, they would do it freely. Probably, this strikes many readers as a surprising thesis for a libertarian to hold. In light of van Inwagen's holding it, the title of his essay—‘Free Will Remains a Mystery’—may seem unsurprising.


Ethics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 94 (4) ◽  
pp. 711-712
Author(s):  
Hilary Kornblith

1985 ◽  
Vol 82 (6) ◽  
pp. 327-330
Author(s):  
Michael Slote ◽  

1986 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-226
Author(s):  
Victoria S. Wike ◽  

2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALEXANDER R. PRUSS

AbstractSome, notably Peter van Inwagen, in order to avoid problems with free will and omniscience, replace the condition that an omniscient being knows all true propositions with a version of the apparently weaker condition that an omniscient being knows all knowable true propositions. I shall show that the apparently weaker condition, when conjoined with uncontroversial claims and the logical closure of an omniscient being's knowledge, still yields the claim that an omniscient being knows all true propositions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document