Esophageal Dilation Demonstrates That the Majority of Esophageal Strictures Are Located in the Distal Esophagus in Adults With Eosinophilic Esophagitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S179-S180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Wang ◽  
Angelika Zalewski ◽  
Dyanna Gregory ◽  
Ikuo Hirano
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Swathi Eluri ◽  
Manaswita Tappata ◽  
Kevin Z Huang ◽  
Nathaniel T Koutlas ◽  
Benjamin S Robey ◽  
...  

SUMMARY While strictures are common in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), there are few data on stricture distribution and characteristics. Our primary aim was to characterize strictures by location in the esophagus in EoE and associated clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features. This was a retrospective study from the UNC EoE Clinicopathologic Database of subjects with esophageal strictures or narrowing from 2002 to 2017. Strictures were categorized as distal esophagus/gastroesophageal junction, mid-esophagus, proximal esophagus, or diffusely narrowed. Stricture location was assessed and compared with clinical, endoscopic, and histologic features, and also with treatment response to diet or topical steroids. Efficacy of combination therapy with dilation and intralesional steroid injection was assessed in a sub-group of patients with strictures. Of 776 EoE cases, 219 (28%) had strictures, 45% of which were distal, 30% were proximal, 5% were mid-esophageal, and 20% had diffuse narrowing. Those with mid-esophageal strictures were younger (P = 0.02) and had shorter symptom duration (P < 0.01). Those with diffuse esophageal narrowing were more likely to be women (57%) and have abdominal pain (25%). There was no association between other clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings and treatment response based on stricture location. Fourteen patients (8%) received intralesional triamcinolone injection and subsequently achieved a higher mean dilation diameter after injection (13.7 vs. 15.5 mm; P < 0.01). In conclusion, almost half of strictures in EoE patients were in the distal esophagus. Therefore, EoE should be a diagnostic consideration in patients with focal distal strictures and not presumed to be secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease.


2014 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. S-16-S-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert T. Kavitt ◽  
Fehmi Ates ◽  
James C. Slaughter ◽  
Tina Higginbotham ◽  
Michael F. Vaezi

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Weidan ◽  
Ali Asad ◽  
Rosenstengle Craig ◽  
Shan Kuangda ◽  
Assouline-Dayan Yehudith

Abstract Aim This study is aimed to assess the safety of esophageal dilation (ED) in a large cohort of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) cases in a single center. Background & Method EoE, the leading cause of food impaction, is a chronic immune-mediated disorder characterized by esophageal dysfunction and mucosal eosinophilic infiltration (≥ 15 eos/hpf). ED is considered a second-line therapy for EoE after failure of medication, due to concern of perforation. We performed a retrospective review of EoE patients who received ED at University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics from 2006 to 2018. ED types, complications, and symptomatic improvement were extracted via chart review. Descriptive statistic with univariate analysis was performed. Results Of 1050 EoE patients, 160 received 295 EDs, ranging from 1-12 dilations per patient, with 67 patients requiring >1 dilations. Procedures were generally well-tolerated, without major bleeds or perforations. The overall complication rate was 6.1%, mostly post-procedural chest pain (4.8%). Three patients had sedation-related complications: one aspiration pneumonia and two ICU admissions for respiratory distress. Symptomatic improvement was documented in 87% of dilations on follow up. Conclusion EoE prevalence is increasing with rates of 1 cases per 1000 individuals, with up to one-third requiring ED for symptomatic relief. Previous reports suggested an increased procedure-related risk, mainly esophageal perforation. However, recent systematic reviews have shown low perforation rate of <0.3%, approximating that of other benign conditions. Our findings are consistent with current data, suggesting that ED should be considered a safe treatment for EoE along with dietary and pharmacological interventions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. S729-S730
Author(s):  
Thomas Runge ◽  
Swathi Eluri ◽  
Cary C. Cotton ◽  
Caitlin Burk ◽  
John Woosley ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1062-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain M Schoepfer ◽  
Nirmala Gonsalves ◽  
Christian Bussmann ◽  
Sébastien Conus ◽  
Hans-Uwe Simon ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M Runge ◽  
Swathi Eluri ◽  
Cary C Cotton ◽  
Caitlin M Burk ◽  
John T Woosley ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-251-S-252
Author(s):  
Swathi Eluri ◽  
Manaswita Tappata ◽  
Kevin Z. Huang ◽  
Nathaniel T. Koutlas ◽  
Benjamin Robey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document