San Mauro at Parentium, Saint Sergius at Gaza, Hagia Sophia in Kiev, and the Protevangelium of James

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 181-190
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Schweigert
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEN DARK ◽  
JAN KOSTENEC
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mark Goodacre

The so-called Protevangelium of James is perhaps the most historically significant of all the non-canonical gospels. In prefacing its account of the birth of Jesus with an account of the birth and childhood of Mary, it has directly or indirectly shaped beliefs about the ‘holy family’ throughout Christian history. It is beyond doubt that the author is familiar with Matthew and Luke’s birth narratives and that he uses them extensively. Yet his use of source texts is seldom predictable, often creative, and almost always in the service of forging a compelling narrative that serves his idiosyncratic take on the tradition. The Protevangelium is a masterpiece of creative synthesis that reveres its source materials while being unafraid to plough its own furrow. This chapter investigates how the Protevangelium interprets and rewrites synoptic narratives, paying special attention to the author’s rewriting of the stories of the annunciation and the birth of Jesus.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Konstantinos M. Vapheiades

After the recapture of Constantinople (1261) artistic production in Byzantium experienced a recovery. In the capital of Byzantium itself this period is marked by the mosaic panel of the Deesis in the Hagia Sophia. This work constitutes a ‘one-off’ in Byzantine art. This fact poses a series of questions concerning the dating, the creator and the patron of the mosaic, as well as the reasons for its creation, given that no source makes any reference to these matters. The present study attempts to re-examine these issues.


2021 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-30
Author(s):  
Daniel P. McCarthy

Christ’s bones are missing at the Holy Sepulchre; St Peter’s bones remain in his basilica; Hagia Sophia was not built on bones. The absence, presence, or lack of bones effects different emphases on memory (anamnesis) and fulfillment (eschatology). In Jerusalem we witness our future glory (eschatology) already revealed in our history (anamnesis); in Rome we recall (anamnesis) the sacrifice of martyrs whose bones remain until the general resurrection (eschatology), even while we venerate the saints in light; at Hagia Sophia liturgy itself, rather than bones, provides the context for remembering the whole Christ in the power of the Spirit. Celebrating liturgy over the bones of martyrs in Rome, while venerating their sacrifice, may have accentuated the sacrificial character of the eucharistic liturgy in the Christian west, whereas in the Christian east the eschatological glory already revealed in our history and in liturgy may have shaped the eschatological character of liturgy.


1950 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 28 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Emerson ◽  
Robert L. van Nice
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Croke
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document