scholarly journals Endovascular stent grafting of a complicated type B aortic dissection with approach through the innominate artery using a side-branch graft

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Calcaterra ◽  
S. Hashimi ◽  
T. C. Brown ◽  
K. Sharma
2008 ◽  
Vol 136 (2) ◽  
pp. 424-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Phillipe Verhoye ◽  
D. Craig Miller ◽  
Daniel Sze ◽  
Michael D. Dake ◽  
R. Scott Mitchell

2004 ◽  
Vol 52 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
LF Duebener ◽  
V Geist ◽  
G Richardt ◽  
A N�tzold ◽  
M Misfeld ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 822-828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reinhard S. Pamler ◽  
Thomas Kotsis ◽  
Johannes Görich ◽  
Xaver Kapfer ◽  
Karl-Heinz Orend ◽  
...  

Purpose: To outline the complications encountered after endoluminal treatment in patients with type B aortic dissection. Methods: Between 1999 and 2001, 14 patients (12 men; mean age 60.3 years, range 39–79) with isolated type B aortic dissection (13 chronic, 1 acute) underwent aortic stent-grafting. Three patients with chronic dissection presented an acute clinical picture and were managed emergently. The left subclavian artery was intentionally covered by the prosthesis in 9 patients. Follow-up studies were performed at 6-month intervals. Results: Stent-graft implantation was technically successful in all patients, but incomplete sealing (endoleak) of the entry site required additional proximal stent-graft implantation in 4. The left subclavian artery remained patent in 5 patients. Secondary conversion was required in 3 patients: 2 for acute type A dissection resulting from injury to the aortic arch by Talent endografts and a sustained hemorrhage (left hemothorax). In another patient, a secondary intramural hematoma subsided spontaneously. Anterior spinal artery syndrome in 1 patient persisted at 1 month. No bypass was necessary for the 9 patients with the covered left subclavian arteries. Mean follow-up was 14 months (range 1–23). Conclusions: Stent-grafting is feasible in patients with type B aortic dissection, although it is associated with a considerable rate of complications. Frank reporting of these sequelae for a variety of stent-grafts is of paramount importance to clarifying the limitations of the method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document