scholarly journals Small mammal communities of tropical forest habitats in Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, southern India

Mammalia ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 69 (3-4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meena Venkataraman ◽  
Kartik Shanker ◽  
Raman Sukumar
1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 462-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Sullivan ◽  
Jacob O. Boateng

This study was designed to compare the responses of small-mammal communities to broadcast burning and herbicide-induced alteration of forest habitats. Study areas were located in south-coastal British Columbia, Canada, in the Coastal Western Hemlock (CWHdm) biogeoclimatic zone, and in west-central British Columbia in the Sub-boreal Spruce (SBSmk) and Engelmann Spruce–Subalpine Fir (ESSFmc) zones. Control–treatment comparisons for a herbicide application or a broadcast burning treatment were conducted at the coastal study area from 1982 to 1984. Replicate control–treatment comparisons between these two silvicultural practices were conducted at the interior study area within the period 1989 to 1992. Small-mammal populations were intensively livetrapped in all control and treatment blocks. Deer mouse (Peromyscusmaniculatus Wagner) populations showed short-term (1–2 months) declines after treatments at the coastal study area but appeared little affected by these habitat alterations at the interior area. Voles of the genus Microtus disappeared from burned blocks at the interior area but Microtusoregoni (Merriam) persisted on the burned block at the coastal area; however, the red-backed vole (Clethrionomysgapperi Vigors) did not. Chipmunks (Eutamiastownsendii Bachman and Eutamiasamoenus Allen) were little affected by either treatment. Neither treatment seemed to affect species diversity of these small-mammal communities. In terms of abundance of small-mammal populations, it is likely that broadcast burning is a more extreme means of habitat alteration than herbicide treatment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 3155-3169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip M. Chapman ◽  
Oliver R. Wearn ◽  
Terhi Riutta ◽  
Chris Carbone ◽  
J. Marcus Rowcliffe ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. F. Chernousova ◽  
O. V. Tolkach ◽  
O. E. Dobrotvorskaya

2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-160
Author(s):  
Hillary S. Young ◽  
Douglas J. McCauley ◽  
Rodolfo Dirzo ◽  
Jacob R. Goheen ◽  
Bernard Agwanda ◽  
...  

1983 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 970-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur M. Martell

Changes in small mammal communities following logging were monitored in clear-cut and strip-cut upland black spruce (Picea mariana) stands and in selectively cut mixed wood stands in north-central Ontario. Clear-cutting and subsequent scarification essentially eliminated the vegetative cover. Much of the ground cover recovered within 5 years and shrubs within 12 years, but mosses and lichens took much longer. The small mammal community in both clear-cut and strip-cut stands changed over the first three years after logging from one dominated by southern red-backed voles (Clethrionomys gapperi) to one dominated by deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and then remained relatively stable for up to 13 years after harvest. That shift was not apparent in selectively cut mixed wood stands where the composition of the small mammal community was similar between uncut stands and stands 4–23 years after harvest. There was relatively little change in total numbers of small mammals after logging. In general, the diversity and evenness of small mammals increased or remained stable in the first 1–3 years following harvest, decreased on older (3–16 years) cuts, and then increased to values similar to those in uncut stands on the oldest (19–23 years) cuts.


2006 ◽  
Vol 231 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 55-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiko Nakagawa ◽  
Hideo Miguchi ◽  
Tohru Nakashizuka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document