The Anthropology of Modern Human Teeth: Dental Morphology and Its Variation in Recent Human Populations

1998 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-808
Author(s):  
John T. Mayhall
Keyword(s):  
Modern Human ◽  
Human Populations ◽  
Dental Morphology ◽  
Human Teeth

scholarly journals Testing the utility of dental morphological trait combinations for inferring human neutral genetic variation

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (20) ◽  
pp. 10769-10777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannes Rathmann ◽  
Hugo Reyes-Centeno
Keyword(s):  
Modern Human ◽  
Genomic Variation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Human Populations ◽  
Dental Morphology ◽  
Genomic Signatures ◽  
Neutral Genetic Variation ◽  
Tooth Form ◽  
Dental Traits ◽  
Population Affinity

Researchers commonly rely on human dental morphological features in order to reconstruct genetic affinities among past individuals and populations, particularly since teeth are often the best preserved part of a human skeleton. Tooth form is considered to be highly heritable and selectively neutral and, therefore, to be an excellent proxy for DNA when none is available. However, until today, it remains poorly understood whether certain dental traits or trait combinations preserve neutral genomic signatures to a greater degree than others. Here, we address this long-standing research gap by systematically testing the utility of 27 common dental traits and >134 million possible trait combinations in reflecting neutral genomic variation in a worldwide sample of modern human populations. Our analyses reveal that not all traits are equally well-suited for reconstructing population affinities. Whereas some traits largely reflect neutral variation and therefore evolved primarily as a result of genetic drift, others can be linked to nonstochastic processes such as natural selection or hominin admixture. We also demonstrate that reconstructions of population affinity based on many traits are not necessarily more reliable than those based on only a few traits. Importantly, we find a set of highly diagnostic trait combinations that preserve neutral genetic signals best (up to x∼r = 0.580; 95% r range = 0.293 to 0.758; P = 0.001). We propose that these trait combinations should be prioritized in future research, as they allow for more accurate inferences about past human population dynamics when using dental morphology as a proxy for DNA.

scholarly journals European early modern humans and the fate of the Neandertals

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (18) ◽  
pp. 7367-7372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Trinkaus
Keyword(s):  
Early Modern ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Modern Human ◽  
Morphological Features ◽  
Middle Paleolithic ◽  
Human Populations ◽  
Dental Morphology ◽  
Modern Humans ◽  
Morphological Aspects ◽  
Early Modern Humans

A consideration of the morphological aspects of the earliest modern humans in Europe (more than ≈33,000 B.P.) and the subsequent Gravettian human remains indicates that they possess an anatomical pattern congruent with the autapomorphic (derived) morphology of the earliest (Middle Paleolithic) African modern humans. However, they exhibit a variable suite of features that are either distinctive Neandertal traits and/or plesiomorphic (ancestral) aspects that had been lost among the African Middle Paleolithic modern humans. These features include aspects of neurocranial shape, basicranial external morphology, mandibular ramal and symphyseal form, dental morphology and size, and anteroposterior dental proportions, as well as aspects of the clavicles, scapulae, metacarpals, and appendicular proportions. The ubiquitous and variable presence of these morphological features in the European earlier modern human samples can only be parsimoniously explained as a product of modest levels of assimilation of Neandertals into early modern human populations as the latter dispersed across Europe. This interpretation is in agreement with current analyses of recent and past human molecular data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document