Acute Myocardial Infarction – The Role of Drug-eluting Stents in Treatment Strategies

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald K Binder ◽  
Ahmed A Khattab ◽  
◽  

Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the cornerstone in the treatment of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (AMI), systemic fribrinolysis may still be considered for patients in areas where PCI is not accessible. The downside of initial plain balloon angioplasty, mainly coronary artery dissection and vessel re-occlusion, was effectively solved by the application of coronary stents. The incidence of target vessel failure, witnessed after bare metal stent (BMS) implantation, was dramatically reduced by the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES), which significantly and effectively alleviate restenosis in the overall population. A minute incidence of late and very late DES thrombosis led to some safety concerns, which were soon rebutted, particularly by the development of newer generation DES. DES have consequently outplayed BMS among almost all anatomical and clinical subgroups of coronary artery disease patients. However, AMI remains one of the last contested territories. Today there is a growing body of evidence to support the use of DES as a safe and effective treatment of AMI.

Author(s):  
Scott W Sharkey ◽  
Mesfer Alfadhel ◽  
Christina Thaler ◽  
David Lin ◽  
Meagan Nowariak ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims  Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) diagnosis is challenging as angiographic findings are often subtle and differ from coronary atherosclerosis. Herein, we describe characteristics of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) caused by first septal perforator (S1) SCAD. Methods and results  Patients were gathered from SCAD registries at Minneapolis Heart Institute and Vancouver General Hospital. First septal perforator SCAD prevalence was 11 of 1490 (0.7%). Among 11 patients, age range was 38–64 years, 9 (82%) were female. Each presented with acute chest pain, troponin elevation, and non-ST-elevation MI diagnosis. Initial electrocardiogram demonstrated ischaemia in 5 (45%); septal wall motion abnormality was present in 4 (36%). Angiographic type 2 SCAD was present in 7 (64%) patients with S1 TIMI 3 flow in 7 (64%) and TIMI 0 flow in 2 (18%). Initial angiographic interpretation failed to recognize S1-SCAD in 6 (55%) patients (no culprit, n = 5, septal embolism, n = 1). First septal perforator SCAD diagnosis was established by review of initial coronary angiogram consequent to cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) demonstrating focal septal late gadolinium enhancement with corresponding oedema (n = 3), occurrence of subsequent SCAD event (n = 2), or second angiogram showing healed S1-SCAD (n = 1). Patients were treated conservatively, each with ejection fraction >50%. Conclusion  First septal perforator SCAD events may be overlooked at initial angiography and mis-diagnosed as ‘no culprit’ MI. First septal perforator SCAD prevalence is likely greater than reported herein and dependent on local expertise and availability of CMR imaging. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection events may occur in intra-myocardial coronary arteries, approaching the resolution limits of invasive coronary angiography.


2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 340-343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Azzarelli ◽  
Damiana Fiscella ◽  
Francesco Amico ◽  
Michele Giacoppo ◽  
Vincenzo Argentino ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document