Cost-effectiveness analysis of transnasal fentanyl citrate for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Ruggeri ◽  
Adriana Turriziani ◽  
Marco Oradei
PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. e0179523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Angelo Cortesi ◽  
Lucia Sara D’Angiolella ◽  
Renato Vellucci ◽  
Massimo Allegri ◽  
Giuseppe Casale ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. A734
Author(s):  
LS D'Angiolella ◽  
PA Cortesi ◽  
F Kheiraoui ◽  
M Allegri ◽  
G Casale ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522098342
Author(s):  
Jacopo Giuliani ◽  
Francesco Fiorica ◽  
Alfredo Sacchetto ◽  
Gianfranco Franceschini ◽  
Ferdinando Vaccari ◽  
...  

The aim of this paper was to assess the drug costs of the different biotechnologies (intranasal fentanyl spray (INFS), oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) and fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT)) in the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain (BTCP). We have calculated the mean drug costs (expressed in euros (€)) for patients treated for BTCP. INFS resulted the less expensive towards OTFC and FBT, with 697 440 €versus (vs.) 809 552 €vs. 779 662 €every 100 patients treated for BTCP, respectively. In conclusion, combining drug costs of different biotechnologies (INFS, OTFC and FBT) with the measure of efficacy represented by the reduction of BTCP avoided (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER), INFS resulted in better cost-effectiveness.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene Laska ◽  
Morris Meisner ◽  
Carole Siegel ◽  
Joseph Wanderling

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document