Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s Rhetoric of Ridicule and Reform

Author(s):  
Lisa Pace Vetter

Elizabeth Cady Stanton, considered the “philosopher” of the early women’s rights movement, has also been criticized for her elitism and racism. This chapter examines an early manuscript in which Stanton presents a set of fundamental principles that shape her life’s work, along with precursors to her controversial comments. These arguments pre-date social Darwinism, which critics often cite as the basis of her racism. They also precede Stanton’s objections to the prospect of enfranchising freed black men before women, many of which included racist and elitist comments. Using Adam Smith’s discussion of Jonathan Swift and the moral rhetoric of ridicule in the Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres as an interpretative frame, this chapter explores the possibility that Stanton’s early remarks are part of a rhetorical strategy that uses ridicule and sarcasm to expose hypocrisy and advocate for reform—while consistently arguing for universal equality. Stanton may have ultimately harbored racist sentiments, but she might have also been continuing her rhetorical strategy of appropriating popular ideas, and even prejudices, to suit her purposes.

Graphic News ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 160-194
Author(s):  
Amanda Frisken

This chapter shows how, in 1895-96, women’s rights activists attempted to use sensationalism to critique the double standard in domestic violence prosecution. Lacking illustrated newspapers of their own, veteran activists including Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, Lucy Stone, and Henry Blackwell, used the pages of the New York Recorder, World, and Journal to apply the “crime of passion” defense to the case of Maria Barbella (or Barberi), a woman tried twice for killing a man who had seduced and dishonored her. Their efforts to introduce into the daily papers a complex debate about women’s rights and the double standard in legal protection helped win the campaign for Barbella’s acquittal. It had the unintended cost of undermining women’s standing to critique honor killings by men.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document