Antenatal Fetal Surveillance

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy J. Cibulka ◽  
Kelly D. Rosenberger
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Surveillance

771 Impact of antenatal fetal surveillance on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women with diabetes

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S481-S482
Author(s):  
Bijan Morshedi ◽  
Amanda Urban ◽  
Aisha Naseem ◽  
Gabrielle Brite ◽  
James Ferguson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Fetal Surveillance

Antepartum fetal surveillance tests during sickle cell crisis

1991 ◽  
Vol 165 (4) ◽  
pp. 1081-1083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akolisa Anyaegbunam ◽  
Marie-Ignace Gauthier Morel ◽  
Irwin R. Merkatz
Keyword(s):  
Sickle Cell ◽  
Fetal Surveillance ◽  
Sickle Cell Crisis

Intrapartum fetal surveillance

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Okosun ◽  
S. Arulkumaran
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Surveillance

Intrapartum fetal surveillance

2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarala Premila ◽  
Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Surveillance

scholarly journals Fetal heart rate tracing interpretation in cases of fetal heart block: A case series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuanglada Tongprasert ◽  
Kasemsri Srisupundit ◽  
Suchaya Leuwan ◽  
Kuntharee Traisrisilp ◽  
Phudit Jatavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Fetal Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Block ◽  
Fetal Heart ◽  
Complete Heart Block ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Fetal Surveillance ◽  
Degree Heart Block ◽  
Second Degree

Simple assessment of FHR baseline variability can differentiate second degree heart block (SHB) from complete heart block (CHB). In cases of SHB, antepartum NST can be reliably used for fetal surveillance. Intrapartum assessment of FHR variability as well as accelerations is useful to select cases for safe vaginal delivery

scholarly journals Modified biophysical profile in antepartum fetal surveillance of high risk pregnancies

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1854
Author(s):  
K. P. Sowmya ◽  
S. R. Mudanur ◽  
Padmasri R. ◽  
Lalitha S.
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Amniotic Fluid ◽  
Perinatal Outcome ◽  
Stress Test ◽  
Fluid Volume ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Amniotic Fluid Volume ◽  
Risk Pregnancy ◽  
Biophysical Profile ◽  
Fetal Surveillance

Background: Fetal biophysical profile is a well-established method of antepartum surveillance in high risk pregnancy. Classical biophysical profile with all parameters (fetal breathing movements, fetal tone, fetal gross body movements, amniotic fluid volume and non-stress test) needs two phase testing by ultrasound and external Doppler monitor to record fetal heart rate, is more cumbersome, time consuming and expensive.Methods: This study was a prospective clinical study which consisted of 70 patients having pregnancy with high risk factors. The patients were evaluated with the modified biophysical profile consisting of NST recording for 20mins, followed ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid volume, using four quadrant technique.Results: When the Modified biophysical profile is normal, it gives reassurance that the fetal status is good with good perinatal outcome. When the MBPP is abnormal there is increased incidence of perinatal morbidity as well as mortality.Conclusions: Modified biophysical profile is an effective primary antepartum fetal surveillance test in high risk pregnancies in predicting perinatal outcome.

Litigation related to intrapartum fetal surveillance

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. 87-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry S. Schifrin ◽  
Mohamed Soliman ◽  
Brian Koos
Keyword(s):  
Fetal Surveillance
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document