Revisiting the Mechanism of Endogenous Technical Change for Climate Policy Analysis

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Jin
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Climate Policy ◽  
Technical Change ◽  
Endogenous Technical Change

Uncertainty and endogenous technical change in climate policy models

2008 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 2817-2828 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Baker ◽  
Ekundayo Shittu
Keyword(s):  
Climate Policy ◽  
Technical Change ◽  
Policy Models ◽  
Endogenous Technical Change

Representing induced technological change in models for climate policy analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 539-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Sue Wing
Keyword(s):  
Technological Change ◽  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Climate Policy ◽  
Induced Technological Change

scholarly journals Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change

2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 55-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrado Di Maria ◽  
Edwin van der Werf
Keyword(s):  
Climate Policy ◽  
Technical Change ◽  
Carbon Leakage ◽  
Directed Technical Change ◽  
Unilateral Climate Policy

scholarly journals Country resolved combined emission and socio-economic pathways based on the RCP and SSP scenarios

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Gütschow ◽  
M. Louise Jeffery ◽  
Annika Günther ◽  
Malte Meinshausen
Keyword(s):  
Policy Analysis ◽  
Climate Policy ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Single Model ◽  
Country Level ◽  
Current Trends ◽  
Climate Policies ◽  
Emissions Scenarios ◽  
Sres Scenarios ◽  
Country Specific

Abstract. Climate policy analysis needs reference scenarios to assess emissions targets and current trends. When presenting their national climate policies, countries often showcase their target trajectories against fictitious so-called baselines. These counterfactual scenarios are meant to present future Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions in the absence of climate policy. These so-called baselines presented by countries are often of limited use as they can be exaggerated and the methodology used to derive them is usually not transparent. Scenarios created by independent modeling groups using integrated assessment models (IAMs) can provide different interpretations of several socio-economic storylines and can provide a more realistic backdrop against which the projected target emission trajectory can be assessed. However, the IAMs are limited in regional resolution. This resolution is further reduced in intercomparison studies as data for a common set of regions are produced by aggregating the underlying smaller regions. Thus, the data are not readily available for country-specific policy analysis. This gap is closed by downscaling regional IAM scenarios to country-level. The last of such efforts has been performed for the SRES scenarios (Special Report on Emissions Scenarios), which are over a decade old by now. CMIP6 scenarios have been downscaled to a grid, however they cover only a few combinations of forcing levels and SSP storylines with only a single model per combination. Here, we provide up to date country scenarios, downscaled from the full RCP (Representative Concentration Pathways) and SSP (Shared Socio-Economic Pathways) scenario databases, using results from the SSP GDP (Gross Domestic Product) country model results as drivers for the downscaling process. The data is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3638137 (Gütschow et al., 2020).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document