scholarly journals On Stable and Strategy-Proof Rules in Matching Markets with Contracts

Author(s):  
Daisuke Hirata ◽  
Yusuke Kasuya
2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Mizobuchi ◽  
Shigehiro Serizawa

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 393-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anisse Ismaili ◽  
Naoto Hamada ◽  
Yuzhe Zhang ◽  
Takamasa Suzuki ◽  
Makoto Yokoo

We investigate markets with a set of students on one side and a set of colleges on the other. A student and college can be linked by a weighted contract that defines the student's wage, while a college's budget for hiring students is limited. Stability is a crucial requirement for matching mechanisms to be applied in the real world. A standard stability requirement is coalitional stability, i.e., no pair of a college and group of students has any incentive to deviate. We find that a coalitionally stable matching is not guaranteed to exist, verifying the coalitional stability for a given matching is coNP-complete, and the problem of finding whether a coalitionally stable matching exists in a given market, is SigmaP2-complete: NPNP-complete. Other negative results also hold when blocking coalitions contain at most two students and one college. Given these computational hardness results, we pursue a weaker stability requirement called pairwise stability, where no pair of a college and single student has an incentive to deviate. Unfortunately, a pairwise stable matching is not guaranteed to exist either. Thus, we consider a restricted market called a typed weighted market, in which students are partitioned into types that induce their possible wages. We then design a strategy-proof and Pareto efficient mechanism that works in polynomial-time for computing a pairwise stable matching in typed weighted markets.


Author(s):  
Avinatan Hassidim ◽  
Assaf Romm ◽  
Ran I. Shorrer

Organizations often require agents’ private information to achieve critical goals such as efficiency or revenue maximization, but frequently it is not in the agents’ best interest to reveal this information. Strategy-proof mechanisms give agents incentives to truthfully report their private information. In the context of matching markets, they eliminate agents’ incentives to misrepresent their preferences. We present direct field evidence of preference misrepresentation under the strategy-proof deferred acceptance in a high-stakes matching environment. We show that applicants to graduate programs in psychology in Israel often report that they prefer to avoid receiving funding, even though the mechanism preserves privacy and funding comes with no strings attached and constitutes a positive signal of ability. Surveys indicate that other kinds of preference misrepresentation are also prevalent. Preference misrepresentation in the field is associated with weaker applicants. Our findings have important implications for practitioners designing matching procedures and for researchers who study them. This paper was accepted by Axel Ockenfels, decision analysis.


2015 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald E. Campbell ◽  
Jerry S. Kelly
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 157-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Ching ◽  
Shigehiro Serizawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document