scholarly journals Optimal Investment with Random Endowments and Transaction Costs: Duality Theory and Shadow Prices

Author(s):  
Erhan Bayraktar ◽  
Xiang Yu
Author(s):  
Tomas Björk

The object of this chapter is to give an overview of the dual approach to portfolio optimization in incomplete markets. The main result of this theory is that to every optimal investment problem there is a dual problem where we minimize a dual objective function over the class of martingale measures. For the case of a finite sample space we can present the full theory, but for the general case we only outline the proof. The theory is closely connected to convex duality theory and to the martingale approach to optimal consumption/investment discussed in Chapter 27.


2008 ◽  
Vol 40 (03) ◽  
pp. 673-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Tamura

We study the problem of maximizing the long-run average growth of total wealth for a logarithmic utility function under the existence of fixed and proportional transaction costs. The market model consists of one riskless asset and d risky assets. Impulsive control theory is applied to this problem. We derive a quasivariational inequality (QVI) of ‘ergodic’ type and obtain a weak solution for the inequality. Using this solution, we obtain an optimal investment strategy to achieve the optimal growth.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (03) ◽  
pp. 847-883
Author(s):  
Xiaoqing Liang ◽  
Virginia R. Young

AbstractWe compute the optimal investment strategy for an individual who wishes to minimize her probability of lifetime ruin. The financial market in which she invests consists of two riskless assets. One riskless asset is a money market, and she consumes from that account. The other riskless asset is a bond that earns a higher interest rate than the money market, but buying and selling bonds are subject to proportional transaction costs. We consider the following three cases. (1) The individual is allowed to borrow from both riskless assets; ruin occurs if total imputed wealth reaches zero. Under the optimal strategy, the individual does not sell short the bond. However, she might wish to borrow from the money market to fund her consumption. Thus, in the next two cases, we seek to limit borrowing from that account. (2) We assume that the individual pays a higher rate to borrow than she earns on the money market. (3) The individual is not allowed to borrow from either asset; ruin occurs if both the money market and bond accounts reach zero wealth. We prove that the borrowing rate in case (2) acts as a parameter connecting the two seemingly unrelated cases (1) and (3).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document