The UK,The Council of Europe and Turkey's International Human Rights Obligations in a State of Emergency: Submission to Foreign Affairs Committee: United Kingdom's Relations with Turkey

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Greene
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Foreign Affairs ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
State Of Emergency ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Uk

scholarly journals Democracy and the Preservation of Minority Identity: Fragmentation within the European Human Rights Framework

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-228
Author(s):  
Stephanie E. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Minority Rights ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Minority Identity ◽  
European Court ◽  
International Human ◽  
Different Origins ◽  
Historical Origins ◽  
Institutional Fragmentation

The international human rights (ihr) and international minority rights (imr) regimes have very different origins. However, the two regimes converged in the 20th century, and imr are now understood to be a sub-regime of ihr. This article argues that the different historical origins of the two regimes impact how actors within each regime interpret their mission, and have resulted in institutional fragmentation within the Council of Europe. The mission of the European Court of Human Rights is the promotion and protection of democracy, whereas the Advisory Committee to the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minority’s mission is the preservation of minority identity. In practice, this has led to conflicting interpretations of multi-sourced equivalent norms. It is suggested that inter-institutional dialogue provides an avenue through which these conflicting interpretations can be mediated.

Representing Japan, Defending Human Rights

2020 ◽  
pp. 131-142
Author(s):  
Bill Emmott
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
War Crimes ◽  
Foreign Affairs ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
Indigenous Minorities ◽  
International Human ◽  
Peace And Reconciliation ◽  
Rights Issues

When Miyoshi Mari joined the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in 1980 as a trainee diplomat she was the only female recruit out of twenty-eight; in 2016, the ministry recruited ten females and eighteen males. So recruitment is not yet equal but there will in future be a much larger number of potential female ambassadors to follow in Miyoshi-san’s footsteps. She was motivated to become a diplomat by an interest in peace and reconciliation, which similarly drew Osa Yukie to study and then become active in international human rights issues. Osa-san has studied indigenous minorities including Japan’s own Ainu but more recently has specialized in the issues of war crimes and genocide.

The European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keir Starmer
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
European Convention ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
International Treaty ◽  
Fundamental Freedoms ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Human Rights Act ◽  
Human Rights Act 1998 ◽  
The Uk

The European Conversion for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) is an international treaty of the Council of Europe. It was adopted in 1950, ratified by the UK in 1951 and entered into force in 1953. The unsual feature of the Convention, as an international human rights instrument, is that it provides a mechanism for individuals to enforce their Convention rights against state parties.

Part I General Concepts, 3 The Plea of State Immunity Distinguished from Act of State and Non-Justiciability

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fox Hazel ◽  
Webb Philippa
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
International Human Rights ◽  
State Immunity ◽  
Foreign State ◽  
The Us ◽  
International Human ◽  
The Uk

This chapter distinguishes the plea of State immunity from the related but different concepts of act of State and non-justiciability, focusing on the approaches taken in the UK and the US. While the doctrines of act of State and non-justiciability will normally work in the same direction as the plea of State immunity to prevent examination of the validity of a foreign State's acts, practice shows that in proceedings between private parties the court may set aside its usual respect for other States' jurisdiction where the acts of the foreign State constitute a fundamental breach of international human rights or other clearly established international law, whereas it will show hesitation in a direct suit to rule against the foreign State defendant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document