Current and Future Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Liver Disease

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lake-Bakaar
2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (8) ◽  
pp. 829-832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Ryan ◽  
Megan Dring ◽  
Cliona M. Ryan ◽  
Carol McNulty ◽  
Nigel J. Stevenson ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 180-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Alves de Mattos ◽  
Eliana Buksztejn Gomes ◽  
Cristiane Valle Tovo ◽  
Cláudio Osmar Pereira Alexandre ◽  
José Oscar dos Reis Remião

BACKGROUND: Considering the immunosuppression of patients with chronic liver disease, their response to vaccination is discussed in literature. AIMS: To evaluate the response of hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. METHODS: This is a prospective study in which 85 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection (46.8 ± 9.4 years, 44.7% males) and 46 healthy adults (36.7 ± 11.1 years; 39.1% males) were evaluated. Confirmation of hepatitis C virus was obtained by the technique of polymerase chain reaction. Viral load was determined by the branched DNA method in 74 patients, and genotype was determined by sequencing in 73 patients. All patients and healthy adults received three doses of Engerix B® vaccine IM (at 0, 30 and 180 days). Serological responses to the vaccine were divided into three categories: seroprotection, when anti-HBs was >100 mUI/mL; seroconversion, when anti-HBs was 10-99 mUI/mL, and non-reagent, when anti-HBs was <10 mUI/mL. RESULTS: The response of hepatitis B vaccine as determined 1 month following dose 3 was seroprotection in 37.7%, seroconversion in 17.6% and non-reagent in 44.7% among patients and 84.8%, 13.0%, 2.2%, respectively in healthy adults. The number of non-reagent responses was significantly higher among those patients with chronic liver disease. Sixty-five patients with chronic hepatitis were compared to 20 compensated cirrhotic patients in concern to the response to vaccine, but no difference was found. The response to vaccine in patients with genotypes 2 or 3 (n = 40) was better than in those with genotype 1 (n = 33). Response was not related to serum HCV-RNA concentration. CONCLUSION: The number of non-responders was higher in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, irrespective of histological status and viral load. It is suggested that such patients should receive a double dose of vaccine, particularly the ones with genotype 1.


2009 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer J. Kiser

Despite reductions in the incidence of new hepatitis C virus infections, infections from previous decades continue to place a substantial burden on our health care system. Although the course of the disease is highly variable, approximately 20% to 30% of patients develop cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, or hepatocellular carcinoma. Fortunately, treatment with our current standard of care, peginterferon a and ribavirin, can reduce the complications of chronic liver disease. However, these drugs are associated with significant adverse effects, many patients are ineligible for treatment, and only 50% are cured. Thus, there is a tremendous need to improve our current therapies and develop new compounds for this disease. This review highlights the transmission, pathophysiology, and course of illness; the pharmacokinetics, proposed mechanisms of action, adverse events, and potential drug interactions with peginterferon a and ribavirin; current treatment trends; the role of the pharmacist in the treatment of this disease; and investigational drugs in later stages of clinical development. Despite the initial hope that these new drugs would replace our current standard of care, it has become clear that ribavirin and peginterferon a will continue to play an important role in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus in the years to come.


2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (30) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Sanna ◽  
Yann Le Strat ◽  
Françoise Roudot-Thoraval ◽  
Sylvie Deuffic Burban ◽  
Patrizia Carrieri ◽  
...  

Given recent profound improvements in the effectiveness of antiviral treatment for chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, we aimed to describe the characteristics of patients referred to hepatology expert centres in France from 2000 to 2007 and from 2010 to 2014, and to identify factors associated with severe liver disease at their first visit for evaluation. We analysed data from two sources covering all of France: the former hepatitis C surveillance network, which included patients between 2000 and 2007, and the ANRS CO22 HEPATHER multi-centre cohort, which included patients between 2012 and 2014. Severe liver disease (SLD) was defined as the presence of either cirrhosis (histological, biochemical or clinical) or hepatocellular carcinoma. Multivariable Poisson regression models were used to identify the factors associated with SLD in complete-case analysis and after multiple imputation. Overall, 16,851 patients were included in the analysis and SLD was diagnosed in 11.6%. SLD at first visit was significantly associated with known risk factors (male sex, history of excessive alcohol intake, HCV genotype 3), late referral to hepatologists after diagnosis and HCV diagnosis at an older age. Providing earlier specialised care and treatment may be an important target for public health action.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document