Shorter Notes: An Invariant Subspace Theorem

1972 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary R. Embry

2000 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-26
Author(s):  
Mingxue Liu

H. Mohebi and M. Radjabalipour raised a conjecture on the invariant subspace problem in 1994. In this paper, we prove the conjecture under an additional condition, and obtain an invariant subspace theorem on subdecomposable operators.





1988 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Rudol

This note provides yet another example of the difficulties that arise when one wants to extend the spectral theory of subnormal operators to subnormal tuples. Several basic properties of a subnormal operator Y remain true for tuples; e.g. the existence and uniqueness of its minimal normal extension N, the spectral inclusion σ(N)⊂ σ(Y)-proved for n-tuples in [4] and generalized to infinite tuples in [5]. However, neither the invariant subspace theorem nor the spectral mapping theorem in the “strong form” as in [3] is known so far for subnormal tuples.



1980 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Agler


1973 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl Pearcy ◽  
Norberto Salinas


1979 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 425-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Agler


1989 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 415-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Lau ◽  
A. L. T. Paterson ◽  
J. C. S. Wong

In [5], Ky Fan proved the following remarkable amenability “invariant subspace” theorem:Let G be an amenable group of continuous, invertible linear operators acting on a locally convex space E. Let H be a closed subspace of finite codimension n in E and X⊂E be such that:(i) H and X are G-invariant;(ii) (e + H) ∩X is compact convex for all e ∈ E;(iii) X contains an n-dimensional subspace V of E. Then there exists an n-dimensional subspace of E contained in X and invariant under G.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document