Environment and Trade: The Relation of International Trade and Environmental Policy. Edited by Seymour J. Rubin and Thomas R. Graham. Published under the auspices of the American Society of International Law. Totowa, N.J.: Allanheld, Osmun & Co. Publishers; London: Frances Pinter (Publishers) Ltd., 1982. Pp. xi, 209. Index. $29.50.

1984 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-516
Author(s):  
Robert Kogod Goldman
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
Environmental Policy ◽  
International Law ◽  
Environment And Trade ◽  
American Society

Environment and Trade: The Relation of International Trade and Environmental Policy

1983 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Frederic L. Kirgis ◽  
Seymour J. Rubin ◽  
Thomas R. Graham
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Environment And Trade

Correction

1986 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-230
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
International Law ◽  
Bar Association ◽  
American Society ◽  
Trade And Investment

The review of Emerging Standards of International Trade and Investment: Multinational Codes and Corporate Conduct (1985) 34 I.C.L.Q. 640 incorrectly stated that it was published under the auspices of the American Bar Association. It should have stated that it was published under the auspices of the American Society of International Law.

Environment and Trade: The Relation of International Trade and Environmental Policy

1984 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 636
Author(s):  
Koon-lam Shea ◽  
Seymour J. Rubin ◽  
Thomas R. Graham
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Environment And Trade

Perfecting Sovereignty?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
International Trade ◽  
International Law ◽  
Popular Sovereignty ◽  
Public Accountability

This chapter examines the idea that our priority ought to be to reform the international trade in resources so as to deliver on popular resource sovereignty, and to deliver upon an ideal of ‘public accountability’ in resource sales. It suggests that ‘accountability’ reforms have some promise, but cannot be considered a replacement for more ambitious egalitarian reforms. Indeed, it shows that we have reason to be cautious about those reforms, in light of their likely effects. It also shows that public accountability and popular sovereignty are not unambiguously enshrined in international law. This reduces the supposed pragmatic advantage of accountability reforms, and their purported superiority over more ambitious egalitarian reforms.

Remarks by Penny Abeywardena

2020 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 362-364
Author(s):  
Penny Abeywardena
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
The Hague ◽  
American Society

Janne thank you so much. First, it is a pleasure to be with this esteemed panel and I want to thank the American Society for International Law and the Municipality of The Hague for bringing us together today.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document