Section Three, 2 Corinthians 2:14–17

2017 ◽  
pp. 161-196 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas D. Stegman

Abstract This article offers a re-reading of ἔγραψα in 2 Cor 2:9. It argues that this verb should be interpreted as an epistolary aorist—thereby indicating a reason for why Paul is presently writing—rather than as a preterit aorist, referring to the “tearful letter.” Reading ἔγραψα as an epistolary aorist in 2:9 resolves tensions with the preceding context produced by the typical interpretation. It also results in a fully coherent reading of 2:5-11, where Paul exhorts the Corinthians to receive back the offender. This study supplements K.L. McKay’s treatment of the epistolary aorist in Novum Testamentum.


1983 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-374
Author(s):  
Francis T. Fallon
Keyword(s):  

Paul's question in 2 Cor 2:16 (“Who is sufficient for these things?”) has long puzzled commentators. Many have noted the abruptness of the question in its context, but few have succeeded in relating the question specifically to the situation that Paul faced. More recently, in his monograph on the opponents of Paul in 2 Corinthians, Dieter Georgi has proposed that in this question Paul is adopting a catchword or slogan (“sufficient”/“sufficiency”) of his opponents and using it against them.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document