On the Epistemic Logic of Incomplete Argumentation Frameworks
We study the relation between two existing formalisms: incomplete argumentation frameworks (IAFs) and epistemic logic of visibility (ELV). We show that the set of completions of a given IAF naturally corresponds to a specific equivalence class of possible worlds within the model of visibility. This connection is further strengthened in two directions. First, we show how to reduce argument acceptance problems of IAFs to ELV model-checking problems. Second, we highlight the epistemic assumptions that underlie IAFs by providing a minimal epistemic logic for IAFs.
2020 ◽
Vol 34
(05)
◽
pp. 7071-7078
Keyword(s):
2016 ◽
Vol 215
◽
pp. 264-282
2019 ◽
Vol 12
(2)
◽
pp. 255-270
◽
Keyword(s):
2017 ◽
Vol 28
(2)
◽
pp. 367-402
◽
Keyword(s):