scholarly journals TUNNELED ADULT PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL CATHETER (PICC) FOR CENTRAL VENOUS ACCESS IN PAEDIATRICS: A SINGLE CENTRE EXPERIENCE

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Nurul Nabila Mortadza ◽  
Arvin Rajadurai ◽  
Norhafizah Ehsan ◽  
Ganesan Arthimulam ◽  
Noorshahrizal Nordin ◽  
...  

Objective: Long term intravenous access in paediatrics is challenging in terms of ease of procedure, maintenance of catheter and complications. Small calibre of peripheral veins in children make insertion of peripheral long-term access difficult. Our centre adopted the use of tunneled adult Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) for central venous access in paediatrics with the hope to improve these challenges. We describe a single institute 3-year experience of this technique. Material & Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients aged less than 12 years old who had tunneled PICC insertions from January 2018 till December 2020. The following data was recorded and studied: indication, reason for removal, duration of PICC, vessel inserted, device type and complications. Results: Eleven adult PICCs were inserted from this technique in 10 children. The average age was 35.7months and weight was 13.2kg. The youngest patient was 3 months old at 6.9kg. Most common indication for insertion was for long term antibiotics (82%) and the remainder were for difficult intravenous access. The procedure was done under local anaesthetic with sedation in 90% of cases. Average duration of PICC was 26.8 days. Out of 11 PICCs only 1 had line related infection that required premature removal of the catheter. 55% completed the intended duration while 27% of PICCs had dislodged. Conclusion: Tunnelled adult PICC for central venous access in paediatrics is a feasible option for long term vascular access and has a lower risk of infection. However, almost a third of the catheters inserted still suffered premature dislodgement.

2020 ◽  
Vol 09 (04) ◽  
pp. 253-256
Author(s):  
Sulav Sapkota ◽  
Raju Sannur ◽  
Radheshyam Naik

Abstract Background Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are now widely used in cancer patients who require long-term treatment, for delivering multiple infusates. We aimed to evaluate the overall use of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in cancer patients, with the objective to study the demographic profile, complications, and safety related to PICC line in cancer patients. Methods All the patients undergoing treatment for hematological and solid malignancies with PICC line inserted at the Healthcare Global Hospital during the study were evaluated prospectively. The complications related to PICC and its safety were analyzed. Results Five hundred PICCs were inserted over a period of 2 years to 8 months for a total of 62,440 catheter days (mean of 24 days, i.e., 4.2 months, range: 1–434 days). The most common indication for PICC was for delivering chemotherapy (100%). Of these, 51 (10.2%) PICCs had complications at the rate of 0.82/1000 PICC days, and hence, 41 PICCs were removed. Hematological malignancies had more complications as compared with those with solid malignancies. Conclusions PICCs are comparatively safe method for the central venous access in cancer patients.


1998 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Franco Tesio ◽  
Hamurabi De Baz ◽  
Giacomo Panarello

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document