scholarly journals ARCH-COMP17 Repeatability Evaluation Report

10.29007/7hvk ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor T. Johnson

This report presents the results of the repeatability evaluation for a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2017. In its first edition, thirteen tools have been applied to solve benchmark problems for the six competition categories, of which, ten tools were evaluated and passed the repeatability evaluation. The repeatability results represent a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks for which they are particularly suited and for which others may repeat their analyses. Due to the diversity of problems in verification of continuous and hybrid systems, as well as basing on standard practice in repeatability evaluations, we evaluate the tools with pass and/or failing being repeatable. These re- sults probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems up to this date.

10.29007/73mb ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Althoff ◽  
Stanley Bak ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Chuchu Fan ◽  
Marcelo Forets ◽  
...  

This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2018. In its second edition, 9 tools have been applied to solve six different benchmark problems in the category for linear continuous dynamics (in alphabetical order): CORA, CORA/SX, C2E2, Flow*, HyDRA, Hylaa, Hylaa-Continuous, JuliaReach, SpaceEx, and XSpeed. This report is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/p11g ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Frehse ◽  
Alessandro Abate ◽  
Dieky Adzkiya ◽  
Lei Bu ◽  
Mirco Giacobbe ◽  
...  

This report presents results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2018. In this second edition, five tools have been applied to solve five different benchmark problems in the category for piecewise constant dynamics: BACH, Lyse, PHAVer, PHAVer-lite, and VeriSiMPL. Compared to last year, a new tool has participated (PHAVer-lite) and a benchmark has been made more complex (Dutch Railway Network). The result is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/rjwn ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Frehse ◽  
Alessandro Abate ◽  
Dieky Adzkiya ◽  
Anna Becchi ◽  
Lei Bu ◽  
...  

This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2019. In this third edition, six tools have been applied to solve five different benchmark problems in the category for piecewise constant dynamics: BACH, Lyse, Hy- COMP, PHAVer/SX, PHAVerLite, and VeriSiMPL. Compared to last year, a new tool has participated (HyCOMP) and PHAVerLite has replaced PHAVer-lite. The result is a snap- shot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/4dcn ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Althoff ◽  
Stanley Bak ◽  
Dario Cattaruzza ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Goran Frehse ◽  
...  

This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2017. In its first edition, seven tools have been applied to solve three different benchmark problems in the category for linear continuous dynamics (in alphabetical order): Axelerator, CORA, Flow*, HyDRA, Hylaa, SpaceEx, and XSpeed. The result is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/7dt2 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Althoff ◽  
Stanley Bak ◽  
Zongnan Bao ◽  
Marcelo Forets ◽  
Goran Frehse ◽  
...  

We present the results of the ARCH1 2020 friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics. In its fourth edition, eight tools have been applied to solve eight different benchmark problems in the category for linear continuous dynamics (in alphabetical order): CORA, C2E2, HyDRA, Hylaa, Hylaa-Continuous, JuliaReach, SpaceEx, and XSpeed. This report is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results provide one of the most complete assessments of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/bj1w ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Althoff ◽  
Stanley Bak ◽  
Marcelo Forets ◽  
Goran Frehse ◽  
Niklas Kochdumper ◽  
...  

This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2019. In its third edition, seven tools have been applied to solve six different benchmark problems in the category for linear continuous dynamics (in alphabetical order): CORA, CORA/SX, HyDRA, Hylaa, JuliaReach, SpaceEx, and XSpeed. This report is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results provide one of the most complete assessments of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/n3km ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran Frehse ◽  
Alessandro Abate ◽  
Dieky Adzkiya ◽  
Lei Bu ◽  
Mirco Giacobbe

This report presents results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2017. In its first edition, four tools have been applied to solve five different benchmark problems in the category for piecewise constant dynamics: BACH, Lyse, PHAVer, and VeriSiMPL. The result is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/bhwx ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Bu ◽  
Alessandro Abate ◽  
Dieky Adzkiya ◽  
Muhammad Syifa'Ul Mufid ◽  
Rajarshi Ray ◽  
...  

This report presents the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2020. In this fourth edition, five tools have been applied to solve six different benchmark problems in the category for piecewise constant dynamics: BACH, PHAVerLite, PHAVer/SX, TROPICAL, and XSpeed. Compared to last year, we combine the HBMC and HPWC categories of ARCH-COMP 2019 to a new category PCDB (hybrid systems with Piecewise Constant bounds on the Dynamics (HPCD) and Bounded model checking (BMC) of HPCD systems). The result is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools, yet the presented results probably provide the most complete assessment of tools for the safety verification of continuous and hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics up to this date.


10.29007/zkf6 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Geretti ◽  
Julien Alexandre Dit Sandretto ◽  
Matthias Althoff ◽  
Luis Benet ◽  
Alexandre Chapoutot ◽  
...  

We present the results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with nonlinear continuous dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2020. This year, 6 tools Ariadne, CORA, DynIbex, Flow*, Isabelle/HOL, and JuliaReach (in alphabetic order) participated. These tools are applied to solve reachability analysis problems on six benchmark problems, two of them featuring hybrid dynamics. We do not rank the tools based on the results, but show the current status and discover the potential advantages of different tools.


10.29007/rvk6 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Bu ◽  
Rajarshi Ray ◽  
Stefan Schupp

This report presents results of a friendly competition for formal verification of continuous and hybrid systems with linear continuous dynamics. The friendly competition took place as part of the workshop Applied Verification for Continuous and Hybrid Systems (ARCH) in 2017. In its first edition, three tools have been applied to solve three different benchmark problems in the category ofbounded model checking of hybrid systems with piecewise constant dynamics (in alphabetical order): BACH, HyDRA, and XSpeed. The result is a snapshot of the current landscape of tools and the types of benchmarks they are particularly suited for. Due to the diversity of problems, we are not ranking tools and we also welcome more tools to join in this friendly competition in the future event.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document