scholarly journals A generalization of Roberts-Tannaka duality theorem

1982 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-59
Author(s):  
Kiyoshi IKESHOJI
1950 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harish-Chandra

2009 ◽  
pp. 109-116
Author(s):  
Ross Street
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ramachandran ◽  
L. Rüschendorf
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M Aarts ◽  
T Nishiura
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Singer

We prove that sup(f-h)(E) = sup(h*-f*)(E*), where f is a proper lower semi-continuous convex functional on a real locally convex space E, h: E → = [-∞, +∞] is an arbitrary-functional and, f*, h* are their convex conjugates respectively. When h = δG, the indicator of a bounded subset G of E, this yields a formula for sup f(G).


2004 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1079-1088
Author(s):  
Mao Zheng Guo ◽  
Xiao Xia Zhang
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. H. Bijan-Zadeh ◽  
R. Y. Sharp

In (11) and (12), a comparatively elementary approach to the use of dualizing complexes in commutative algebra has been developed. Dualizing complexes were introduced by Grothendieck and Hartshorne in (2) for use in algebraic geometry; the approach to dualizing complexes in (11) and (12) differs from that of Grothendieck and Hartshorne in that it avoids use of the concepts of triangulated category, derived category, and localization of categories, and instead places great emphasis on the concept of quasi-isomorphism of complexes of modules over a commutative Noetherian ring.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document