scholarly journals Validating the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised in the Korean Population

Author(s):  
Miae Oh ◽  
Da-Yea Song ◽  
Guiyoung Bong ◽  
Nan-He Yoon ◽  
So Yoon Kim ◽  
...  
Autism ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 545-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gnakub Norbert Soke ◽  
Amy Philofsky ◽  
Carolyn Diguiseppi ◽  
Dennis Lezotte ◽  
Sally Rogers ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 219-227 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Zander ◽  
Charlotte Willfors ◽  
Steve Berggren ◽  
Christina Coco ◽  
Anette Holm ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann Le Couteur ◽  
Michael Rutter ◽  
Catherine Lord ◽  
Patricia Rios ◽  
Sarah Robertson ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 175 (5) ◽  
pp. 444-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibel Kazak Berument ◽  
Michael Rutter ◽  
Catherine Lord ◽  
Andrew Pickles ◽  
Anthony Bailey

BackgroundGood interview and diagnostic measures for autism and other pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) are available but there is a lack of a good screening questionnaire.AimsTo develop and test a screening questionnaire based on items in the best available diagnostic interview – the Autism Diagnostic Interview – Revised (ADI–R)MethodA 40 -item scale, the Autism Screening Questionnaire (ASQ), was developed and tested on a sample of 160 individuals with PDD and 40 with non-PDD diagnoses.ResultsThe ASQ has good discriminative validity with respect to the separation of PDD from non-PDD diagnoses at all IQ levels, with a cut-off of 15 proving most effective. The differentiation between autism and other varieties of PDD was weaker.ConclusionsThe ASQ is an effective screening questionnaire for PDD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document