scholarly journals Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of airway changes after treatment with Carriere Motion 3D Class II appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khaled Hazem Attia ◽  
Mai Hamdy Aboulfotouh ◽  
Ahmed Sherien Fouda
2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 163 ◽  
Author(s):  
U Young Lee ◽  
Dae Kyoon Park ◽  
Soon Jung Hwang ◽  
Kyoung Bok Jo ◽  
Seung Ho Han

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Wilson ◽  
Nikoleta Konstantoni ◽  
Ki Beom Kim ◽  
Patrick Foley ◽  
Hiroshi Ueno

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare treatment effects of the standard and shorty Class II Carriere Motion appliances (CMAs) on adolescent patients. Materials and Methods Fifty adolescents with Class II malocclusion formed group 1, who were treated with shorty CMA (n = 25, 12.66 ± 1.05 years), and age- and sex–matched group 2, who were treated with standard CMA (n = 25, 12.73 ± 1.07 years). Treatment effects were analyzed by tracing with Invivo software to compare pretreatment (T1) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images with post-CMA (T2) CBCT images. A total of 23 measurements were compared within and between groups. Results In groups 1 and 2, maxillary first molars showed significant distal movement from T1 to T2 (1.83 ± 2.11 mm and 2.14 ± 1.34 mm, respectively), with distal tipping and rotation in group 1 (6.52° ± 3.99° and 3.15° ± 7.52°, respectively) but only distal tipping (7.03° ± 3.45°) in group 2. Similarly, in both groups, the maxillary first premolars experienced significant distal movement with distal tipping but no significant rotation. In group 1, maxillary canines did not undergo significant distal movement. In both groups 1 and 2, mandibular first molars experienced significant mesial movement (1.85 ± 1.88 mm and 2.44 ± 2.02 mm, respectively). Group 1 showed statistically significantly less reduction in overjet and less canine distal movement with less distal tipping than group 2 (α < .05). Conclusions The shorty CMA achieved Class II correction similarly to the standard CMA, with less change in overjet and distal tipping movement of the maxillary canines.


2020 ◽  
Vol 157 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Moreira Oliveira ◽  
Paula Loureiro Cheib-Vilefort ◽  
Henrique de Pársia Gontijo ◽  
Camilo Aquino Melgaço ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
PAN JIANG ◽  
YUXING BAI ◽  
FEI HU ◽  
XUEYANG ZHANG ◽  
QUN YANG ◽  
...  

Great variation has been found in sagittal condylar inclination (SCI) values among individuals with different skeletal structures. Therefore, average value articulators cannot fully represent the physiological characteristics of the mandible, or reproduce its sagittal movements. The purpose of this study was to measure the SCI value of skeletal Class II patients by two different three-dimensional assessments, and to evaluate the correlation and consistency between the two methods. A total of 23 patients (aged 15–65 years) diagnosed with skeletal Class II malocclusion were recruited from the Stomatological Center of Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University. Subjects were divided into three groups based on different A point–nasion–B point angle (ANB), and angle between the upper central incisor and Frankfort horizontal plane (U1-FH). Bilateral SCI values were measured using computer-aided diagnosis axiography (CADIAX) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Statistical analysis showed that the SCI value measured by CADIAX was significantly higher than that measured by CBCT. Significant differences were found among different ANB and U1-FH groups, and the average value of the [Formula: see text] group was the highest. Our findings indicate that the measurement of SCI by CADIAX cannot be replaced by CBCT, and it is recommended that personalized measurements of SCI values in skeletal class II patients be carried out. Individual SCI measurement can help coordinate the physiological characteristics of patients in dental treatment, benefit the health of temporomandibular joint and improve the long-term outcome. Our results suggest that the SCI values obtained by CBCT is different from the real SCI values of patients, and we will look for a simpler and more accurate clinical method to measure SCI value in future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document