Confucianism as a Practical Principle of Sport Ethics

Author(s):  
Oh-Ryun Kwon ◽  
Dong-il Han ◽  
Hee-Sub Kim ◽  
Jeong-Hyo Kim
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 248-251
Author(s):  
A.A. PEREDEL’SKIY ◽  
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-54
Author(s):  
Hidenori TOMOZOE ◽  
Yoshitaka KONDO
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
pp. 247-260
Author(s):  
Tim L. Elcombe ◽  
Douglas Hochstetler
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 146349962093205
Author(s):  
Susanne Brandtstädter

Justice understood as a practical principle and virtue has remained an understudied subject in the anthropology of morality. Moral anthropology has explored the moral or ethical as a space of freedom and creativity, whereas justice has often been associated with rule-following or even the law. In contrast, my paper explores justice as a virtue whose social dynamic can initiate moral change in ordinary life. This virtue, as I understand it, comprises not only a disposition to conform to established norms but also a capacity to reformulate these in the pursuit of social justice. My ethnography of Chinese peasant lawyers’ moral agency suggests that their understanding of justice as an essentially social, rule-governed and outcome-oriented virtue can grant new insights into the dynamics of moral innovation that arise in ordinary life. The peasant lawyers of rural northern China pursue moral change through combining moral reasoning about justice with principled action for justice and the provision of benefits for victims of injustice. It is the concern with the consequences of principled action that distinguishes justice as a social virtue from the other virtues, and the justice motif from alternative drivers of social change.


Society ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 517-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoan Grosset ◽  
Michael Attali
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Hurych

Self-competition versus Internal CompetitionThis paper attempts to draw attention to the problem of self-competition as a very specific and controversial type of competition and gives a proposal for division between self-competition and internal competition, both of them as special different forms of competition within one individual person.This basis of the problem is inspired by the article On Competing Against Oneself (Howe, 2008) published in Sport, Ethics and Philosophy. Howe is engaged in the motive of competition which is usually called "self competition". She disagrees with Krein (2007) who argues that self-competition cannot be spoken about within adventure therapy because of the absence of competitors and the lack of repeatable measure of performance.As a consequence of this question the contribution is focused on the relation between self-competition and individual challenge on the one hand and the phenomenon of experience on the other hand. The term of "internal competition" is suggested here and the differences between self-competition and internal competition are explained. The mentioned relation is understood as an equivalence which is accompanied by some concrete examples from the area of movement activities.The aim of the essay is to show the complexity of the relationship between experience and competition motives. The other goal is to introduce the term of internal competition, as the phenomenon closely connected with experience. At least in some cases internal competition can be considered as the essential part of experience. While self-competition is very closely connected with the result of the activity and level of the performance, internal competition is far more focused on the process and depth of the experience.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-162
Author(s):  
Slobodan Sadzakov

This paper discusses the aspects of Rousseau?s understandimg of egoism, primarily those related to his highlighting of historical dimension of the problem, including the economical reasons for establishing this practical principle as an important part of the civil reproduction of life. Among other things, it analyses the contextual connection of egoism with relevant definitions in Rousseau?s work such as human nature, natural law, general will etc. and the difference of Rousseau?s overview of this problem from other important philosophers, for example Hobbes. This paper underlines how the French philosopher, on the basis of key assumptions of his practical philosophy, points at the historical dependence and the possibility of overcoming the egoistic actions, and endeavors to pave the way to a multilateral practical unlocking of the potentials of freedom in its political, moral and legal sense.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document