A case of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-107
Author(s):  
S.V. Shchekaturov ◽  
◽  
M.M. Kaabak ◽  
A.K. Zokoev ◽  
E.R. Charchyan ◽  
...  
1983 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 1023-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
C D M Fletcher ◽  
P E M Jarrett

Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis is uncommon enough to be placed low down on a list of differential diagnoses of any problem facing a general surgeon in a district hospital. In this paper, 4 cases of retroperitoneal fibrosis are described, all of whom presented within a 5-year period to the same surgeon; each described a different symptomatology. This paper serves to reiterate the diversity of presenting features in retroperitoneal fibrosis and to demonstrate that this condition may not be as rare as is widely believed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
pp. 1662-1665 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Martorana ◽  
Ana Márquez ◽  
F. David Carmona ◽  
Francesco Bonatti ◽  
Alessia Adorni ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 162 (5) ◽  
pp. 1680-1680 ◽  
Author(s):  
TAKESHI AZUMA ◽  
YUJI KATO ◽  
TAKAHIRO SUETOMI ◽  
MUNEHIRO NOZAWA ◽  
HIROSHI KUJI ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoichiro Mukai ◽  
Naotaka Sakamoto ◽  
Hiroaki Kakinoki ◽  
Tadamasa Shibuya ◽  
Ryosuke Moriya ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: To evaluate the management and outcome of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (iRPF) in Japan, and identify its clinical biomarker. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients with iRPF treated between January 2008 and May 2018 at 12 university and related hospitals. Patients treated with glucocorticoid were analyzed to identify a predictive biomarker. These patients were classified into three groups according to overall effectiveness (no change: NC, complete response: CR and partial response groups: PR), and each parameter was compared statistically.Results: Male-female ratio was 5: 1, and median age at diagnosis was 69 (33-86) years. Smoking history was reported in 59.6% of the patients. As treatment, 95 patients received glucocorticoid therapy with an overall response rate of 84%. As a result, serum concentration of IgG4 was significantly decreased in NC group compared with the other two groups (56.6mg/dL vs 255mg/dL, 206mg/dL, P=0.0059 and 0.0078). ROC analysis was performed between the non-responder (NC) and responder groups (CR+PR) to identify the cut-off value of serum IgG4 as a predictive marker. As a result, AUC was 0.793 and the values of sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 and 0.64, respectively, under the cut-off values of 67.6mg/dL. Conclusions: In the majority of iRPF patients, glucocorticoid therapy resulted in a favorable response. Pre-treatment serum IgG4 concentration may have potential as a predictive biomarker of steroid treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document