scholarly journals Home Bias and Local Contagion: Evidence from Funds of Hedge Funds

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Sialm ◽  
Zheng Sun ◽  
Lu Zheng
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 4771-4810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clemens Sialm ◽  
Zheng Sun ◽  
Lu Zheng

Abstract Our paper analyzes the geographical preferences of hedge fund investors and the implication of these preferences for hedge fund performance. We find that funds of hedge funds overweigh their investments in hedge funds located in the same geographical areas and that funds with a stronger local bias exhibit superior performance. Local bias also gives rise to excess flow comovement and extreme return clustering within geographic areas. Overall, our results suggest that while funds of funds benefit from local advantages, their local bias also creates market segmentation that can destabilize the underlying hedge funds.


CFA Digest ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-15
Author(s):  
Keith H. Black

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Dewaele ◽  
Hugues Pirotte ◽  
Nils Tuchschmid ◽  
Erik Wallerstein

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 2355-2381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikas Agarwal ◽  
George O. Aragon ◽  
Zhen Shi

We examine liquidity transformation by funds of hedge funds (FoFs) by developing a new measure, illiquidity gap, that captures the mismatch between the liquidity of their portfolios and the liquidity available to their investors. We find that higher liquidity transformation is driven by FoFs’ incentives to attract more capital and earn higher compensation. Greater liquidity transformation is associated with higher exposure to investor runs and worse performance during crisis periods. Finally, FoFs mitigate the risks associated with liquidity transformation by maintaining higher cash buffers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document